An Essay...Last updated 25 August 2000
NEAR'S NEW VIEW OF EROS:
IMPACT PROCESSES AND SPACE WEATHERING
25
August 2000
Meteoritical Society,
Chicago, August 2000
Clark R. Chapman
Southwest Research
Institute, Boulder CO
and
The NEAR MSI/NIS Team
Abstract. Eros has been found to resemble Ida in
almost all respects (e.g. saturated cratering, S(IV) spectral type, bulk
density, and probable ordinary chondritic composition) except for one: it lacks the prominent color differences
seen on Galileo's multispectral images of Ida.
The latter have been ascribed to recent, fresh units (impact penetration
to bedrock and irregular distribution of fresh ejecta around Ida) which
contrast with the redder coloration of most of Ida's surface, explained by an
as-yet-unidentified "space weathering" process that reddens Ida's
surface with time. Eros exhibits the
same reddened coloration as Ida, presumably due to space-weathering inasmuch as
NEAR's X-ray compositional measurements indicate that Eros has an L- or
LL-chondrite-like composition which should not appear to be so red. Here we attribute the lack of any fresh
units having ordinary chondrite-like colors to a plausible ~50 Myr hiatus in
cratering of Eros following its dynamical removal from the impact environment
of the main asteroid belt, during which space weathering has reached maturity
everywhere on the body. Other possible implications
of such a cratering hiatus are also discussed, including implications for the
origin of the numerous boulders on Eros and the possible role of usually minor
geological processes in shaping the geomorphology of Eros.
INTRODUCTION
Some fundamental issues in planetary science depend on
identifying meteorite parent bodies.
There has been a wide presumption that ordinary chondritic and
carbonaceous chondritic material represents the predominant material in the
inner solar system at the time of planetary accretion. In addition, the differentiated meteorites
show that an uncertain fraction of primordial material was heated to the point
of melting at early times. So it
remains uncertain whether non-differentiated chondritic material (as represented
in our meteorite collections) is representative of the materials from which the
planets accreted.
One of the longest standing issues in asteroid science
has been the nature of S-type asteroids, the second most common type of
asteroid, and their relationship to meteorites. In particular, there has been debate about whether (a) meteorites
are a highly selective, non-representative sample of inner-main-belt asteroids
and that the apparent spectral dissimilarity between S-types and the common
ordinary chondrites (OC's) means that the common S-type asteroids are parents
of rare or non-sampled meteorites (like the differentiated stony-irons and rare
achondrites) or (b) the sampling is roughly representative and the
spectral dissimilarity between the common S-types and common OC's means that
non-differentiated asteroidal surfaces are subject to some kind of "space
weathering" process[1]
that modifies the OC spectral traits observed in the laboratory to appear
S-like.
Abundant evidence assembled in the last five years has
swung the pendulum strongly in favor of the second option -- that some or many
S-types are space-weathered OC's -- including analysis of spatial variations in
the reflectance spectrum of Ida (Chapman, 1996), analysis of the systematics of
spectral data of Earth-approaching S-types (Binzel et al., 1996), and
laboratory simulations of plausible space weathering processes (Moroz et al.,
1996; Yamada et al., 1999).
Nevertheless, the arguments have been indirect and remain debatable.
The NEAR-Shoemaker mission to Eros has provided the first
opportunity to take the analysis of an S-type's composition to the next
level. NEAR-Shoemaker's complement of
instruments was designed to measure an independent suite of remotely sensed
indicators of mineralogical and chemical composition with sufficient precision
to distinguish between the major meteorite types. The measurement techniques are X-ray, γ-ray, near-IR
spectroscopy, and multi-spectral imaging, in addition to constraints provided
for bulk density from the radio science, laser-ranging, and imaging
experiments. In addition,
NEAR-Shoemaker was planned to achieve unprecedented spatial resolution for
multispectral imaging and near-IR spectroscopy by orbiting Eros at much closer
distances than were reached by the distant Galileo flybys of the S-type
asteroids Gaspra and Ida. Compositional
variations across the surface of an asteroid can be especially diagnostic, as
first demonstrated by Gaffey (1984) from spectral differences resolved only
hemispherically; Chapman (1996) later studied compositional variations on Ida
at Galileo's much higher resolution.
Needless to say, NEAR-Shoemaker's results for Eros
represent only a single asteroid within the very large and heterogeneous S-type
class and cannot be blithely applied to all other S-types. However, Eros represents a particularly
pertinent test of the inferences previously made from groundbased studies. On the one hand, the mean groundbased
reflectance spectrum of Eros appears to be in the S(IV) subclass of Gaffey et
al. (1993), thought at the time to be more likely (or least unlikely) to be
OC's than any other S-type subclass. On
the other hand, reinterpretation of groundbased spectra of Eros by Murchie
& Pieters (1996) revealed possible hemispheric variations that were
considerably greater than would be expected for a homogeneous,
non-differentiated parent body (i.e. outside of the bounds of such known
variations within one type of OC as the range of petrologic class).
Partway through NEAR-Shoemaker's orbital mission, it has
become fairly clear what the final picture of Eros' mineralogy will be. Its evident spatial homogeneity in spectral
properties, as observed by both the Near-Infrared Spectrometer (NIS) and
especially by the Multispectral Imager (MSI), as well as preliminary chemical
data from the X-ray detector (thanks to energetic solar flares accompanying
solar maximum) both point away from any differentiated composition and toward
an OC composition (in particular, Trombka [2000] stated that Eros resembles
either an L or LL chondrite in the major-element chemistry to which X-ray
fluorescence is sensitive). (Some
depletions, relative to chondritic, in sulfur and possibly other elements have
been noted, perhaps indicating partial melting, but global differentiation
remains ruled out.) The OC
interpretation for the composition of Eros is consistent with the 2.67 gm/cm^3
bulk density of Eros and with preliminary evidence that the density is homogeneous,
given L- or LL-like densities and a modest fraction of void space.
Even if one accepts, at this preliminary stage, the
evidence suggesting that Eros is a low-iron OC, or a strongly heated L- or
LL-like assemblage with some partial melting, there remains a striking
puzzle. To date, neither the NIS data
nor the MSI images indicate any significant (to within 2 or 3 percent)
color variations across the surface of Eros that can be ascribed to intrinsic
mineralogical differences. This
statement appears to be true down to the spatial resolutions that had been
achieved by mid-May when the NIS went out of service -- roughly a couple of km
for NIS and many tens of meters for MSI.
(Some very slight color differences have been seen, but most probably
relate to photometric effects. There
are hints of correlations between geology and very minor color variations.)
Such spatial uniformity, however, would not have been
expected on the basis of earlier observations of Eros and, especially, based on
the experience of Ida. It is plausible
that the apparent hemispheric color differences seen in groundbased data
(Murchie & Pieters 1996) were not real inasmuch as they were near the
systematic error limits. However, the
tens-of-percent color variations on Ida presented a reasonable picture
(described by Chapman, 1996) of an OC body, subject both to space weathering
and impacts, which would seem to be applicable to Eros. Recent impacts would excavate fresh OC
material (with observed spectral traits approaching OC), which would then be
subject to space weathering with time, gradually maturing into S-type
(reddened) colors. A goal of this essay
is to analyze why this is not evidently true for Eros. If Eros is truly of OC composition, then its
S-type (rather than OC-like) colors must reflect some generic form of space
weathering. Yet it shows no evidence
for such in situ evolution of OC-like colors in recently formed units to
space-weathered colors for older geological units. What's going on?
IMPACT AND SPACE-WEATHERING
ENVIRONMENT OF EROS
Ida presents the most reasonable analog for Eros, rather
than Gaspra, because Galileo's observations of Ida were more comprehensive, and
at better resolution, than for Gaspra.
Moreover, Gaspra's appearance (geologically and spectrally) is
dissimilar from Eros in that it has a low crater density and its spectrum is
too olivine-rich to be OC. Indeed,
Chapman (1997) concluded that Gaspra was probably a metal-rich, differentiated
object. Despite the fact that Gaspra
exhibits modest color differences across its surface, it is therefore unlikely
that it would be a good analog for Eros.
Ida, on the other hand, is also an S(IV) with a bulk
density very similar to that of Eros.
If Chapman's (1996) conclusion is correct that Ida is OC-like in
composition, then it is a very good analog for Eros. In the case of Ida, major color variations across its surface
have been modelled (Geissler et al., 1996) as ejecta from the largest
(~7 km diameter) recent impact crater on Ida, named Azzurra. The spectral reflectances of both Azzurra
and its irregularly distributed ejecta are much more OC-like than most of Ida
(Chapman, 1996); Sullivan et al. (1996) and Chapman (1996) have also
pointed out that some other small, fresh craters on Ida exhibit spectra less
than half-way evolved from OC to S-like.
The hypothesis is, therefore, that recent impacts have penetrated the
surficial, gardened regolith to bedrock, have excavated OC-like materials, and
have ballistically distributed those materials in patches around the body; they
have not had time to reach spectral maturity.
The age of Azzurra is uncertain, of course. Chapman et al. (1996a) estimate Ida's
age as ~2 x 10^9 years.
Azzurra is about the 6th or 7th largest crater recognized on Ida and is
probably the morphologically freshest of those. It also may be fresher than any other crater on the well-imaged
side of Ida down to 1.5 to 2 km diameter.
Although Azzurra could have formed very recently, it is more
reasonable to expect that it has an age of roughly 100 Myr, a small fraction of
Ida's average age. A rather small
percentage (perhaps <5%) of prominent, small craters on the well-imaged side
of Ida exhibit the prominent color differences that indicate that space
weathering has not yet gone to completion, again implying a timescale for space
weathering of somewhat less than 100 Myr.
My hypothesis for Eros is that its spectral uniformity
reflects a recent history in which space weathering has continued but during
which there has been a hiatus in large-scale cratering. While "space weathering" is a
generic term not implicating any particular physical process for the inferred
modification with time of the spectral properties of asteroidal bedrock to
S-type characteristics, there exist several hypotheses about physical
mechanisms. The most promising source
of energy to modify the surface grains is instantaneous zapping by
micrometeorites and, perhaps, by solar wind particles. What it is, precisely, that changes the
chemistry and optical properties of affected minerals like olivine is the
subject of continuing research. In any
case, such processes ought to be widespread in the solar system, both in the
asteroid belt and in regions closer to the Sun where Eros now orbits. Even asteroidal dust, generated in the
asteroid belt, spreads inward in the solar system due to radiation forces. Indeed, according to some concepts of space
weathering processes, they should be more efficient closer to the Sun, where
there is a greater flux of solar wind particles and where impact velocities are
higher. Those may be two factors (among
others, including the repetitive gardening of the lunar regolith due to the
Moon's higher gravity) that result in the much more extreme space weathering
effects on the Moon; space weathering has long been held to be responsible for
the extreme differences between laboratory spectra of lunar rocks and
regionally-averaged spectra of the lunar surface.
Macroscopic cratering, on the other hand, operates at a
radically greater rate for bodies within the main asteroid belt than for those
that orbit wholly interior to the belt.
The cratering rate is down roughly three orders of magnitude in the
latter case. So my simple idea is that
Eros has been decoupled from asteroidal cratering for the last several percent
of its lifetime (say 10 to 100 Myr) so that space weathering has had a chance
to mature on even the most recently formed geological units that are resolvable
by the NEAR-Shoemaker spectral instruments.
It is not possible to deterministically trace the past
orbital history of Eros because of chaotic dynamics. Presently, Eros' aphelion distance of 1.78 AU restricts it from
interacting with almost any main-belt asteroid, excepting only those few near
the inner edge of the belt that have unusually high eccentricities. But in the past, the orbit of Eros has
surely undergone major variations since Eros was first derived from the
asteroid belt. Numerical simulations of
sixteen Eros clones by Michel et al. (1998) illustrate the most likely
orbital behaviors for Eros; Michel et al. also addressed, in advance of
NEAR-Shoemaker's arrival at Eros, the possible impact history of Eros.
Let us consider the plausible dynamical history of Eros,
paying special attention to the implied cratering history. First, it should be noted (as is obvious
from all recent NEAR-Shoemaker images of Eros) that Eros is saturated with
craters of diameters >100 m, with a crater frequency distribution very
similar to that on Ida (see figure).
This suggests that Eros was cratered in the asteroid belt (not in
an orbit mostly decoupled from the belt).
Moreover, it must have been exposed to cratering, subsequent to its
"creation" by catastrophic fragmentation of a parent body, for a time
appreciably longer than the 200 Myr estimated cratering age of undersaturated
Gaspra (Chapman et al., 1996b), perhaps 1 Gyr.
Zappalà et al. (1997) proposed that the
catastrophic break-up of a sizeable parent asteroid that created the Maria
family might be the origin for the large near-Earth asteroids Eros and
Ganymed. In their scenario, however,
Eros would have been placed in the 3:1 resonance immediately and begun its
orbital evolution quickly. Indeed, it
probably would have evolved in a few million years to crash into the Sun (90%
die within 11 Myr, as discussed by Gladman et al, 1997, and Migliorini et
al., 1998). Such quick evolution
seems to be incompatible with the very long times expected between such major
family-producing collisions. If we were
lucky enough that the Maria family formed less than a few tens of Myr ago so
that we can be observing Eros during its brief history as an Earth-approacher,
we would not expect it to be heavily cratered at all.
The simulation of sixteen Eros clones by Michel et al.
(1998) presents a very different picture of Eros' likely origin. Eros is in a type of orbit that is unusually
long-lived for Earth-approaching asteroids, with a typical lifetime of 50 - 100
Myr before solar crash, ejection from the solar system by Jupiter, or
less-likely impacts with the terrestrial planets. Rather than being derived from the immediate vicinity of a
resonance, objects like Eros are more likely derived from more typical parts of
the main asteroid belt; then they slowly diffuse (due to numerous minor
resonances) to become Mars-crossing (Migliorini et al., 1998). Thus Eros is expected by Michel et al.
to have been formed "long before its eventual insertion into the current
Mars-crossing orbit." The bulk of
its cratering presumably occurred before it became Mars-crossing, yet
there is the possibility that its orbital aphelion continued to remain in the
asteroid belt, in which case it might have continued to be cratered during the
last several tens of Myr.
Michel et al. (1998) have calculated the average
intrinsic collision probabilities with main-belt asteroids of their sixteen
clones during the 5 Myr integrations and also the mean impact velocities. What they find is that individual clones
range from having impact histories comparable to that of an average main-belt
asteroid (3 of the 16 clones) to having cratering rates down by two orders of
magnitude (half of the clones).
If Eros, like half of the clones, has had a history in
which its cratering rate has been depressed by a factor of ~100 during the last
many tens of millions of years, then we have a natural explanation for its
spectral homogeneity. If Eros has
existed for 1 Gyr and has been in something resembling its present orbit for 50
Myr, then it was able to receive only 0.05% of its cumulative cratering during
the last 50 Myr. Such a history would
virtually rule out the formation of any Azzurra-like crater on its surface. Moreover, the largest crater expected to
have been formed on Eros during the last 50 Myr would be under 0.5 km diameter,
which might well fail to penetrate regolith and excavate bedrock, thus
explaining the lack of freshly excavated materials like those observed on Ida.
Above I estimated that the timescale for space-weathering
on Ida is less than 100 Myr. Assuming
that the rate is at least that rapid for Eros, which is closer to the Sun and
in a higher-velocity micrometeorite collisional environment, then it is very
plausible that the most recent excavations of fresh material just prior to
Eros' orbital removal from the main-belt collisional environment would have had
time to become maturely space-weathered by now.
DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSIONS
We normally think of asteroids as being modified almost
exclusively by ongoing collisions and cratering. We think of most features of asteroids as being created and
destroyed in a quasi-steady-state fashion, occasionally spiked by the
stochastic effects of a rare, very large impact that may suddenly generate
ejecta blankets, boulders, cracks, etc.
Eros, however, may well have been in a virtual hiatus in cratering
activity for the last tens of millions of years.
Therefore, we see a tableau of Eros as it existed tens of
Myr ago when, by slow dynamical processes, it was gradually extricated from the
collisional environment in which it had existed for perhaps 95% of its
existence. A corollary of such a recent
hiatus, however, is that other processes that are normally overwhelmed by the
usual cratering rates suddenly are augmented in relative efficacy by two orders
of magnitude. We need to think about
what such processes might be.
One example has been discussed at length in this
essay: space-weathering processes,
caused perhaps by inner solar system micrometeoroids and solar wind particles
impacting the surface, have a chance to mature with virtually none of the usual
competing regolith gardening processes due to macroscopic impactors.
Mass wasting and readjustment processes, usually
overwhelmed by cratering, might become manifest during a long cratering
hiatus. For example, thermal cycling
continues as Eros rotates every five hours and the small expansions and
contractions might yield accumulated downslope movement (thermal creep) and
other manifestations that we usually don't see or think about. If Eros undergoes polar wandering, as has
been suggested due to its nearly identical b and c moment of inertias, changing
magnitudes and directions of stress within the body might even yield observable
tectonic features that would cross-cut virtually all impact craters.
Such enhanced endogenic geological processes might
explain an unexpected observation concerning craters on Eros (see Figure). Before NEAR-Shoemaker descended to low
orbits, modest resolution images revealed a crater size-frequency distribution
very much like that seen on Ida and on the lunar surface. When craters much smaller than 100 meters
diameter were imaged, however, it became apparent that such smaller craters are
increasingly rare -- an order-of-magnitude less than empirical saturation at 20
meter diameters. (Indeed boulders
become more frequent than craters at diameters smaller than 20 meters!) This is extraordinarily unexpected, and
radically different from what is observed on the Moon. The highly degraded morphologies of most of
these smaller craters suggest an erosional or blanketing process -- uncoupled
from cratering -- has degraded and destroyed smaller craters. The enhanced relative magnitude of endogenic
processes, described above, during a cratering hiatus could explain these
unexpected data. Alternatively, a major
impact event could have generated blanketing ejecta shortly before the
cratering hiatus and there has been little or no re-cratering since.
Conceivably a small fraction of crater ejecta blocks wind
up in temporary orbits around asteroids, later leaking into heliocentric orbits
or re-impacting the asteroid. In the
usual situation, such re-impacts compete at a low level with the continued
cratering of the surface by asteroidal projectiles and by low-velocity crater
ejecta. However, during the
hypothesized hiatus in cratering, the decay and re-impact of blocks orbiting
around Eros might continue for an appreciable time (depending on the timescale
for decay) and could preferentially contribute to the most recent features on
the surface of Eros. For instance, it
is possible that a significant fraction of the numerous blocks found on Eros
might be reimpacted satellites which have not, as would normally be the
case, been covered over or destroyed by subsequent impacts and regolith
evolution. (The thoughts in this
paragraph are being developed in collaboration with Bill Merline.)
Insofar as issues of space weathering and the composition
of Eros and S-type asteroids are concerned, this essay primarily demonstrates
that there is a natural explanation for what otherwise would seem to be a
disconnect between Eros and our experience with Ida. Now, it can be understood that Ida and Eros might be very similar
bodies in all respects, excepting only that Eros has been removed from
continued cratering very recently in its history. Quantification of these ideas might even lead to estimates of the
relative rates of space weathering on Eros and Ida (which could even lead to
clues about what the predominant space weathering process is); and it might
lead to constraints on the type of dynamical orbit (among the classes defined
by Milani et al, 1989 and discussed by Michel et al., 1998) that
Eros has been in; that, in turn, might shed further light on Eros' place of
origin within the main asteroid belt.
REFERENCES
Binzel, R.P., S.J. Bus,
T.H. Burbine & J.M. Sunshine 1996.
Spectral properties of near-Earth asteroids: Evidence for sources of ordinary
chondrite meteorites. Science 273,
946-948.
Chapman, C.R. 1996. S-type asteroids, ordinary chondrites, and
space weathering: The evidence from Galileo's fly-bys of Gaspra and Ida. Meteoritics and Planet. Sci. 31,
699-725.
Chapman, C.R. 1997. Gaspra and Ida: Implications of spacecraft
reconnaissance for NEO issues. In Near-Earth
Objects: The United Nations Conference (ed. J. Remo, Ann. N.Y. Acad.
Sci. 822), 227-235.
Chapman, C.R., E.V. Ryan,
W.J. Merline, G. Neukum, R. Wagner, P.C. Thomas, J. Veverka & R.J. Sullivan
1996a. Cratering on Ida. Icarus 120, 77-86.
Chapman, C.R., J.
Veverka, M.J.S. Belton, G. Neukum & D. Morrison 1996b. Cratering on Gaspra. Icarus 120, 231-245.
Gaffey, M.J. 1984. Rotational spectral variations of asteroid
(8) Flora: Implications for the nature of the S-type asteroids and for the
parent bodies of the ordinary chondrites.
Icarus 60, 83-114.
Gaffey, M.J., J.F. Bell,
R.H. Brown, T.H. Burbine, J.L. Piatek, K. Reed & D.A. Chaky 1993. Mineralogical variations within the S-type
asteroid class. Icarus 106,
573-602.
Geissler, P., J-M. Petit,
D.D. Durda, R. Greenberg, W. Bottke & M. Nolan 1996. Erosion and ejecta reaccretion on 243 Ida
and its moon. Icarus 120,
140-157.
Gladman, B.J., F.
Migliorini, A. Morbidelli, V. Zappalà, P. Michel, A. Cellino, Ch. Froeschlé,
H.F. Levison, M. Bailey & M. Duncan 1997.
Dynamical lifetimes of objects injected into asteroid belt resonances. Science 277, 197-201.
Michel, P., P. Farinella
& Ch. Froeschlé 1998. Dynamics of
Eros. Astron. J. 116,
2023-2031.
Migliorini, F., P.
Michel, A. Morbidelli, D. Nesvorný & V. Zappalà 1998. Origin of multikilometer Earth- and
Mars-crossing asteroids: A quantitative simulation. Science 281, 2022-2024.
Milani, A., M. Carpino,
G. Hahn, A.M. Nobili 1989. Dynamics of
planet-crossing asteroids: Classes of orbital behavior. Icarus 78, 212-269.
Moroz, L.V., A.V.
Fisenko, L.F. Semjonova, C.M. Pieters & N.N. Korotaeva 1996. Optical effects of regolith processes on
S-asteroids as simulated by laser shots on ordinary chondrite and other mafic
materials. Icarus 122,
366-382.
Murchie, S.L. & C.M.
Pieters 1996. Spectral properties and
rotational spectral heterogeneity of 433 Eros.
J. Geophys. Res--Planets 101, 2201-2214.
Sullivan, R., R. Greeley,
R. Pappalardo, E. Asphaug, J.M. Moore, D. Morrison, M.J.S. Belton, M. Carr,
C.R. Chapman, P. Geissler, R. Greenberg, J. Granahan, J.W. Head III, R. Kirk,
A. McEwen, P. Lee, P.C. Thomas & J. Veverka 1996. Geology of 243 Ida. Icarus
120, 119-139.
Trombka, J. 2000. Presentation at American Geophys. Union
meeting, Washington D.C., May 2000.
Yamada, M., S. Sasaki, H.
Nagahara, A. Fujiwara, S. Hasegawa, H. Yano, T. Hiroi, H. Ohashi & H. Otake
1999. Simulation of space weathering of
planet-forming materials: Nanosecond pulse laser irradiation and proton
implantation on olivine and pyroxene samples.
Earth Planets Space 51, 1255-1265.
Zappalà, V., A. Cellino,
M. DiMartino, F. Migliorini & P. Paolicchi 1997. Maria's family: Physical structure and possible implications for
the origin of giant NEAs. Icarus
129, 1-20.
FIGURE CAPTION. This is an R-plot (differential
size-frequencies divided by D^-3) showing the spatial densities of
craters and boulders on Eros larger than 10 meters diameter. Craters larger than 200 meters diameter
resemble the empirically saturated frequencies of craters on Ida; but smaller craters
are deficient. On the other hand, small
boulders are very numerous.
[1]"Space
weathering," as used in this essay, refers to an unknown process or
processes that modifies the optical reflectance properties (especially spectral
reflectance) of surface materials with time.
That such spectral changes with time happen has long been
well-documented for the Moon, and more recently for asteroids. While the process/es are believed to be due
to exposure of the surface materials to space, and hypotheses of specific
processes have been proposed, the details of what causes space
weathering is of secondary concern for this essay so long as it occurs for
bodies in near-Mars and near-Earth space.
Available Abstracts, Preprints, Articles.
Clark R. Chapman's Publications.