There were no new TNO discoveries announced since the previous issue of
Distant EKOs , but there were 4 new Centaur/SDO discoveries:
2010 JO179, 2017 QF33, 2016 QF86, 2017 RG16
Reclassified objects:
2014 SE350 (TNO → SDO)
2015 BZ517 (TNO → SDO)
Objects recently assigned numbers:
2
2010 OO127 = (499514)
2010 PL66 = (499522)
2013 GR136 = (500828)
2013 GT136 = (500829)
2013 GU136 = (500830)
2013 GV136 = (500831)
2013 GZ136 = (500832)
2013 GD137 = (500833)
2013 GK137 = (500834)
2013 GN137 = (500835)
2013 GQ137 = (500836)
2013 GT137 = (500837)
2013 GV137 = (500838)
2013 GW137 = (500839)
2013 GA138 = (500840)
2013 HT156 = (500856)
2013 JD64 = (500876)
2013 JE64 = (500877)
2013 JG64 = (500878)
2013 JH64 = (500879)
2013 JJ64 = (500880)
2013 JM64 = (500881)
2013 JN64 = (500882)
2013 JJ65 = (500883)
2013 JK65 = (500884)
2013 JL65 = (500885)
2013 JN65 = (500886)
2013 JO65 = (500887)
2013 JP65 = (500888)
2013 SA87 = (501105)
2013 TC146 = (501214)
2014 JJ80 = (501546)
2014 OB394 = (501581)
2015 PN291 = (503273)
Objects recently assigned names:
1999 TC36 = Lempo
1999 XX143 = Aphidas
Current number of TNOs: 1814 (including Pluto)
Current number of Centaurs/SDOs: 721
Current number of Neptune Trojans: 17
Out of a total of 2552 objects:
707 have measurements from only one opposition
698 of those have had no measurements for more than a year
343 of those have arcs shorter than 10 days
(for more details, see:
http://www.boulder.swri.edu/ekonews/objects/recov_stats.jpg )
PAPERS ACCEPTED TO JOURNALS |
|
The Pluto System After the New Horizons flyby
C. Olkin1, K. Ennico2, and J. Spencer1
1 Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, CO, USA
2 NASA Ames, Mountain View, CA, USA
In July 2015, NASA's New Horizons mission performed a flyby of Pluto,
revealing details about the geology, surface composition and atmospheres
of this world and its moons that are unobtainable from Earth. With a
resolution as small as 80 metres per pixel, New Horizons' images
identified a large number of surface features, including a large basin
filled with glacial ices that appear to be undergoing convection. Maps
of surface composition show latitudinal banding, with non-volatile
material dominating the equatorial region and volatile ices at mid and
polar latitudes. This pattern is driven by the seasonal pattern of solar
insolation. New Horizons' atmospheric investigation found the
temperature of Pluto's upper atmosphere to be much cooler than
previously modelled. Images of forward-scattered sunlight revealed
numerous haze layers extending up to 200 km from the surface. These
discoveries have transformed our understanding of icy worlds in the
outer Solar System, demonstrating that even at great distances from the
Sun, worlds can have active geologic processes. This Review addresses
our current understanding of the Pluto system and places it in context
with previous investigations.
Published in:
Nature Astronomy
Available on the web at https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-017-0257-3
The Pluto System After New Horizons
S.A. Stern1, W.M. Grundy2, W.B. McKinnon3, H.A. Weaver4, and L.A. Young1
1 Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, Colorado, USA
2 Lowell Observatory, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
3 Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
4 Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Columbia, Maryland, USA
The discovery of Pluto in 1930 presaged the discoveries of both the
Kuiper Belt and ice dwarf planets - the third class of planets in our
solar system. From the 1970s to the 1990s, numerous fascinating
attributes of this binary planet were discovered, including multiple
surface volatile species, the presence of its largest satellite Charon,
and its atmosphere. These attributes, and the 1990s discovery of the
Kuiper Belt and Pluto's cohort of small Kuiper Belt planets motivated
the spacecraft exploration of Pluto. That mission, called New Horizons
(NH), revolutionized our knowledge of Pluto and its system of moons in
mid-2015. Beyond providing rich geological, compositional, and
atmospheric datasets, NH demonstrated that Pluto has been surprisingly
geologically and climatologically active throughout the past 4+ Gyr, and
that the planet exhibits a surprisingly complex range of atmospheric
phenomenology and geological expressions that rival Mars in their
richness.
To appear in:
Annual Reviews of Astronomy and Astrophysics
The New Horizons and Hubble Space Telescope Search For Rings, Dust, and Debris in the Pluto-Charon System
Tod R. Lauer1, Henry B. Throop2, Mark R. Showalter3,
Harold A. Weaver4, S. Alan Stern5, John R. Spencer5,
Marc W. Buie5, Douglas P. Hamilton6, Simon B. Porter5,
Anne J. Verbiscer7, Leslie A. Young5, Cathy B. Olkin5,
Kimberly Ennico8, and the New Horizons Science Team
1 National Optical Astronomy Observatory P.O. Box 26732, Tucson, AZ 85726, USA
2 Planetary Science Institute, 1700 E Fort Lowell Rd. #106, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA
3 SETI Institute, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA
4 The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD 20723-6099, USA
5 Department of Space Studies, Southwest Research Institute, 1050 Walnut St., Suite 300, Boulder, CO 80302, USA
6 Astronomy Department, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
7 Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904 8NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA
We conducted an extensive search for dust or debris rings in the
Pluto-Charon system before, during, and after the New Horizons encounter
in July 2015. Methodologies included attempting to detect features by
back-scattered light during the approach to Pluto (phase angle
α ∼ 15
°),
in situ detection of impacting particles, a
search for stellar occultations near the time of closest approach, and
by forward-scattered light imaging during departure
(α ∼ 165
°). An extensive search using the Hubble Space
Telescope (HST) prior to the encounter also contributed to the final
ring limits. No rings, debris, or dust features were observed, but our
new detection limits provide a substantially improved picture of the
environment throughout the Pluto-Charon system. Searches for rings in
back-scattered light covered the range 35,000-250,000 km from the
system barycenter, a zone that starts interior to the orbit of Styx,
the innermost minor satellite, and extends out to four times the orbital
radius of Hydra, the outermost known satellite. We obtained our firmest
limits using data from the New Horizons LORRI camera in the inner half
of this region. Our limits on the normal I/F of an unseen ring depends
on the radial scale of the rings: 2×10
−8 (3σ) for 1500 km
wide rings, 1×10
−8 for 6000 km rings, and 7×10
−9
for 12,000 km rings. Beyond ∼ 100,000 km from Pluto, HST
observations limit normal I/F to ∼ 8×10
−8. Searches for
dust features from forward-scattered light extended from the surface of
Pluto to the Pluto-Charon Hill sphere (r
Hill=6.4×10
6 km).
No evidence for rings or dust clouds was detected to normal I/F limits
of ∼ 8.9×10
−7 on ∼ 10
4 km scales. Four stellar
occultation observations also probed the space interior to Hydra, but
again no dust or debris were detected. The Student Dust Counter detected
one particle impact 3.6×10
6 km from Pluto, but this is
consistent with the interplanetary space environment established during
the cruise of New Horizons. Elsewhere in the solar system, small moons
commonly share their orbits with faint dust rings. Our results support
recent dynamical studies suggesting that small grains are quickly lost
from the Pluto-Charon system due to solar radiation pressure, whereas
larger particles are orbitally unstable due to ongoing perturbations by
the known moons.
To appear in:
Icarus
Available on the web at https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.07981
The Size, Shape, Density and Ring of the Dwarf Planet Haumea from a Stellar Occultation
J.L. Ortiz1, P. Santos-Sanz1, B. Sicardy2, G. Benedetti-Rossi3,
D. Bérard2, N. Morales1, R. Duffard1, F. Braga-Ribas3,4,
and the Haumea occultation international collaboration5
1 Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (CSIC), Glorieta de la Astronomía s/n, 18008-Granada, Spain
2 LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, PSL Research University, CNRS, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Universités Paris 06, Universités Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France
3 Observatório Nacional/MCTIC, Rua General José Cristino 77, Rio de Janeiro CEP 20921-400, Brazil
4 Federal University of Technology-Paraná (UTFPR/DAFIS), Rua Sete de Setembro 3165, CEP 80230-901 Curitiba, Brazil
5 https://cloud.iaa.csic.es/public.php?service=files&t=d9276f8ab1a316cef13bee28bef75add
Haumea - one of the four known trans-Neptunian dwarf planets - is a very
elongated and rapidly rotating body. In contrast to other dwarf planets,
its size, shape, albedo and density are not well constrained. The
Centaur Chariklo was the first body other than a giant planet known to
have a ring system, and the Centaur Chiron was later found to possess
something similar to Chariklo's rings. Here we report observations from
multiple Earth-based observatories of Haumea passing in front of a
distant star (a multi-chord stellar occultation). Secondary events
observed around the main body of Haumea are consistent with the presence
of a ring with an opacity of 0.5, width of 70 kilometres and radius of
about 2,287 kilometres. The ring is coplanar with both Haumea's equator
and the orbit of its satellite Hi'iaka. The radius of the ring places it
close to the 3:1 mean-motion resonance with Haumea's spin period - that
is, Haumea rotates three times on its axis in the time that a ring
particle completes one revolution. The occultation by the main body
provides an instantaneous elliptical projected shape with axes of about
1,704 kilometres and 1,138 kilometres. Combined with rotational light
curves, the occultation constrains the three-dimensional orientation of
Haumea and its triaxial shape, which is inconsistent with a homogeneous
body in hydrostatic equilibrium. Haumea's largest axis is at least 2,322 kilometres,
larger than previously thought, implying an upper limit for
its density of 1,885 kilograms per cubic metre and a geometric albedo of
0.51, both smaller than previous estimates. In addition, this estimate
of the density of Haumea is closer to that of Pluto than are previous
estimates, in line with expectations. No global nitrogen- or
methane-dominated atmosphere was detected.
Published in:
Nature, 550, 219 (2017 October 12)
For preprints, contact psantos@iaa.es
or on the web at http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v550/n7675/full/nature24051.html
The Structure of Chariklo's Rings from Stellar Occultations
D. Bérard1, B. Sicardy1, J.I.B. Camargo2,3,
J. Desmars1, F. Braga-Ribas2,3,4, J.-L. Ortiz5,
R. Duffard5, N. Morales5, E. Meza1, R. Leiva1,6,
G. Benedetti-Rossi2,3, R. Vieira-Martins2,3,7,8, A.-R. Gomes
Júnior8, M. Assafin8, F. Colas7, J.-L. Dauvergne9,
P. Kervella1,10, J. Lecacheux1, L. Maquet7,
F. Vachier7, S. Renner11, B. Monard12,
A.A. Sickafoose13,14, H. Breytenbach13,15,
A. Genade13,15, W. Beisker16,17, K.-L. Bath16,17,
H.-J. Bode16,17, M. Backes18, V. D. Ivanov19,20,
E. Jehin21, M. Gillon21, J. Manfroid21,
J. Pollock22, G. Tancredi23, S. Roland24,
R. Salvo24, L. Vanzi25, D. Herald26,27,28,
D. Gault26,29, S. Kerr26,30, H. Pavlov26,27,
K.M. Hill31, J. Bradshaw27,32, M.A. Barry26,33,
A. Cool34,35, B. Lade34,35,36, A. Cole31,
J. Broughton26, J. Newman28, R. Horvat29,
D. Maybour37, D. Giles29,37, L. Davis29,
R.A. Paton29, B. Loader26,27, A. Pennell26,38,
P.-D. Jaquiery38,39, S. Brillant20, F. Selman20,
C. Dumas40, C. Herrera20, G. Carraro41, L. Monaco42,
A. Maury43, A. Peyrot44, J.-P. Teng-Chuen-Yu44,
A. Richichi45, P. Irawati46, C. De Witt16,
P. Schoenau16, R. Prager17, C. Colazo47,48,
R. Melia48, J. Spagnotto49, A. Blain50, S. Alonso51,
A. Román52, P. Santos-Sanz5, J.-L. Rizos5,
J.-L. Maestre53, and D. Dunham27
1 LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, PSL Research University, CNRS, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ. Paris 06, Univ. Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France
2 Department of Electrical Engineering and Center of Astro-Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Av. Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Santiago, Chile
3 Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía, CSIC, Apt. 3004,18080 Granada, Spain
4 IMCCE, Observatoire de Paris, PSL Research University, CNRS, Sorbonne Universités,
UPMC Univ. Paris 06, 77 av. Denfert-Rochereau, 75014, Paris, France
5 Institut d'Astrophysique de l'Université de Liège, Allée du 6 Août 17, B-4000 Liège, Belgique
6 Instituto de Astrofísica, Facultad de Física, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Av. Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Santiago, Chile
7 Physics and Astronomy Department, Appalachian State Univ., Boone, NC 28608, USA
8 Ministerio de Educación de la Provincia de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina
9 Observatorio Astronómico, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina
10 IOTA/ES, Barthold-Knaust-Strasse 8, D-30459 Hannover, Germany
11 Occultation Section of the Royal Astronomical Society of New Zealand (RASNZ), Wellington, New Zealand
12 International Occultation Timing Association (IOTA), PO Box 7152, Kent, WA 98042, USA
13 Samford Valley Observatory, QLD, Australia
14 ESO, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 2, 85748 Garching bei, München, Germany
15 ESO, Alonso de Cordova 3107, Casilla 19001, Santiago 19, Chile
16 Software Engineering Department, University of Granada, Spain
17 Western Sydney Amateur Astronomy Group (WSAAG), Sydney, NSW, Australia
18 Canberra Astronomical Society, Canberra, ACT, Australia
19 Observatorio Astronómico Los Molinos, DICYT, MEC, Montevideo, Uruguay
20 Dpto. Astronomia, Facultat de Ciencias, Uruguay
21 San Pedro de Atacama Celestial Explorations, Casilla 21, San Pedro de Atacama, Chile
22 Observatorio El Catalejo, Santa Rosa, La Pampa, Argentina
23 Observatório do Valongo/UFRJ, Ladeira Pedro Antonio 43, RJ 20.080-090 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
24 Observatório Nacional/MCTIC, R. General José Cristino 77, RJ 20921-400 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
25 Laboratório Interinstitucional de e-Astronomia - LIneA, Rua Gal. José Cristino 77, Rio de Janeiro- RJ 20921-400, Brazil
26 Unidad Mixta Internacional Franco-Chilena de Astronomía (CNRS UMI 3386), Departamento de Astronomía, Universidad de Chile, Camino El Observatorio 1515, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile
27 Federal University of Technology- Paraná (UTFPR/DAFIS), Rua Sete de Setembro, 3165, CEP 80230-901, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
28 Astronomical Association of Queensland, QLD, Australia
29 School of Physical Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 37, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia
30 Electrical and Information Engineering Department, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
31 Penrith Observatory, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
32 Stockport Observatory, Astronomical Society of South Australia, Stockport, SA, Australia
33 Defence Science & Technology Group, Edinburgh, South Australia
34 The Heights Observatory, Modbury Heights, South Australia
35 South African Astronomical Observatory, PO Box 9, Observatory, 7935, South Africa
36 Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139-4307, United States
37 National Astronomical Research Institute of Thailand, Siriphanich Building, Chiang Mai 50200 - Thailand
38 Sociedad Astronómica Granadina, Granada, Spain
39 Asociación Argentina Amigos de la Astronomía, Av. Patricias Argentinas 550, Buenos Aires, Argentina
40 Departamento de Ciencias Fisicas, Universidad Andres Bello, Fernandez Concha 700, Santiago, Chile
41 Ciel & Espace, Paris, France
42 Makes Observatory,La Réunion, France
43 Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Universita di Padova, Italy
44 Internationale Amateursternwarte e. V., IAS, Hakos/Namibia and Bichlerstr. 46, D-81479, Munich), Germany
45 Observatorio Astronómico de Albox, Apt. 63, 04800 Albox (Almeria), Spain
46 INAF - Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Largo E. Fermi 5, 50125 Firenze, Italy
47 Royal Astronomical Society of New Zealand (RASNZ), Wellington, New Zealand
48 Dunedin Astronomical Society, Dunedin, New Zealand
49 University of Cape Town, Department of Astronomy, Rondebosch , Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa, 7700
50 Department of Physics, University of Namibia, 340 Mandume Ndemufayo Ave, P/Bag 13301, Windhoek, Namibia
51 IMCCE, Observatoire de Paris, CNRS UMR 8028, Université Lille 1, Observatoire de Lille 1 impasse de l'Observatoire, 59000 Lille, France
52 Kleinkaroo Observatory, Calitzdorp, St. Helena 1B, P.O. Box 281, 6660 Calitzdorp, Western Cape, South Africa
53 TMT International Observatory, 100 West Walnut Street, Suite 300, Pasadena, CA 91124, USA
Two narrow and dense rings (called C1R and C2R) were discovered around
the Centaur object (10199) Chariklo during a stellar occultation
observed on 2013 June 3. Following this discovery, we planned
observations of several occultations by Chariklo's system in order to
better characterize the physical properties of the ring and main body.
Here, we use 12 successful occultations by Chariklo observed between
2014 and 2016. They provide ring profiles (physical width, opacity, edge
structure) and constraints on the radii and pole position. Our new
observations are currently consistent with the circular ring solution
and pole position, to within the ±3.3 km formal uncertainty for the
ring radii derived by Braga-Ribas et al. The six resolved C1R profiles
reveal significant width variations from ∼ 5 to 7.5 km. The width of the
fainter ring C2R is less constrained, and may vary between 0.1 and 1 km.
The inner and outer edges of C1R are consistent with infinitely sharp
boundaries, with typical upper limits of one kilometer for the
transition zone between the ring and empty space. No constraint on the
sharpness of C2R's edges is available. A 1σ upper limit of ∼ 20 m
is derived for the equivalent width of narrow (physical width < 4 km)
rings up to distances of 12,000 km, counted in the ring plane.
Published in:
The Astronomical Journal, 154, 144 (2017 October)
Preprints on the web at https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.00207
Size and Shape of Chariklo from Multi-epoch Stellar Occultations
R. Leiva1,2, B. Sicardy1, J.I.B. Camargo3,4,
J.-L. Ortiz5, J. Desmars1, D. Bérard1, E. Lellouch6,
E. Meza1, P. Kervella1,7, C. Snodgrass8, R. Duffard5,
N. Morales5, A.R. Gomes-Júnior9, G. Benedetti-Rossi3,4,
R. Vieira-Martins3,4,9, F. Braga-Ribas3,4,10,
M. Assafin9, B. E. Morgado3, F. Colas11,
C. De Witt12, A.A. Sickafoose13,14, H. Breytenbach13,15,
J.-L. Dauvergne16, P. Schoenau12, L. Maquet11,
K.-L. Bath12,17, H.-J. Bode12,17,25, A. Cool18,19,
B. Lade18,19,20, S. Kerr21,22, and D. Herald21,23,24
1 LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, CNRS UMR 8109, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Université Paris-Diderot, 5 place Jules Janssen, F-92195 Meudon Cédex, France
2 Instituto de Astrofísica, Facultad de Física, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Av. Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Santiago, Chile
3 Observatório Nacional/MCTIC, Rua General José Cristino 77, RJ 20921-400, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
4 Laboratório Interinstitucional de e-Astronomia - LIneA, Rua General José Cristino 77, RJ 20921-400, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
5 Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía, CSIC, Glorieta de la Astronomía s/n, E-18008, Granada, Spain
6 LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, PSL Research University, CNRS, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ. Paris 06, Univ. Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 5 place Jules Janssen, F-92195 Meudon, France
7Unidad Mixta Internacional Franco-Chilena de Astronomía (CNRS UMI 3386), Departamento de Astronomía, Universidad de Chile, Camino El Observatorio 1515, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile
8School of Physical Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK
9Observatório do Valongo/UFRJ, Ladeira Pedro Antonio 43, RJ 20.080-090, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
10Federal University of Technology- Paraná (UTFPR/DAFIS), Rua Sete de Setembro, 3165, CEP 80230-901, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
11 IMCCE, Observatoire de Paris, PSL Research University, CNRS, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ. Paris 06, 77 Av. Denfert-Rochereau, F-75014, Paris, France
12 IOTA/ES, Barthold-Knaust-Strasse 8, D-30459 Hannover, Germany
13South African Astronomical Observatory, P.O. Box 9, 7935 Observatory, South Africa
14Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139-4307, USA
15Department of Astronomy, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town, 7700, South Africa
16 AFA/Ciel et Espace, 17 Emile Deutsch de la Meurthe, F-75014, Paris, France
17 Internationale Amateursternwarte e. V. IAS, Hakos/Namibia and Bichler Str. 46, D-81479, Munich, Germany
18 Defence Science & Technology Group, P.O. Box 1500, Edinburgh SA 5111, Australia
19 The Heights Observatory, 12 Augustus St, Modbury Heights SA 5092, Australia
20 Stockport Observatory, Astronomical Society of South Australia, Stockport, SA, Australia
21 Occultation Section of the Royal Astronomical Society of New Zealand (RASNZ), P.O. Box 3181, Wellington, New Zealand
22 Astronomical Association of Queensland, 5 Curtis Street, Pimpama QLD 4209, Australia
23 International Occultation Timing Association (IOTA), P.O. Box 7152, Kent, WA 98042, USA
24 Canberra Astronomical Society, Canberra, ACT, Australia
25 Deceased, 2017 July 16
We use data from five stellar occultations observed between 2013 and
2016 to constrain Chariklo's size and shape, and the ring reflectivity.
We consider four possible models for Chariklo (sphere, Maclaurin
spheroid, tri-axial ellipsoid and Jacobi ellipsoid) and we use a
Bayesian approach to estimate the corresponding parameters.
The spherical model has a radius R=129 ±3 km.
The Maclaurin model has equatorial and polar radii
a=b=143
+3−6 km and c=96
+14−4 km,
respectively, with density 970
+300−180 kg m
−3.
The ellipsoidal model has semiaxes
a=148
+6−4 km,
b=132
+6−5 km and
c=102
+10−8 km.
Finally, the Jacobi model has semiaxes
a=157±4 km,
b=139± 4 km and
c=86±1 km,
and
density 796
+2−4 kg m
−3.
Depending on the model, we obtain topographic features of 6-11 km,
typical of Saturn icy satellites with similar size and density.
We constrain Chariklo's geometric albedo between 3.1% (sphere) and 4.9% (ellipsoid),
while the ring I/F reflectivity is less constrained between 0.6% (Jacobi) and 8.9% (sphere).
The ellipsoid model explains both the optical light curve and the long-term photometry variation of the system,
giving a plausible value for the geometric albedo of the ring particles of 10−15%.
The derived Chariklo's mass of 6-8×10
18 kg places the rings close to the 3:1 resonance between
the ring mean motion and Chariklo's rotation period.
Published in:
The Astronomical Journal, 154, 159 (2017 October)
Preprints available on the web at https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.08934
and https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aa8956
"TNOs are Cool": A Survey of the Trans-Neptunian Region XIII. Statistical Analysis of Multiple Trans-Neptunian Objects Observed with Herschel Space Observatory
I.D. Kovalenko1,5, A. Doressoundiram1, E. Lellouch1, E. Vilenius2, T. Müller3, and J. Stansberry4
1 LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, PSL Research University, CNRS, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ. Paris 06, Univ. Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 5 place Jules Janssen, 92195 Meudon Principal Cedex, France
2 Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 3, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
3 Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik (MPE), Giessenbachstrasse, 85748 Garching, Germany
4 University of Arizona, Tucson, USA
5 Institute of Astronomy, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pyatnitskaya 48, 119017 Moscow, Russia
Context. Gravitationally bound multiple systems provide an
opportunity to estimate the mean bulk density of the objects, whereas
this characteristic is not available for single objects. Being a
primitive population of the outer Solar System, binary and multiple
trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs) provide unique information about bulk
density and internal structure, improving our understanding of their
formation and evolution.
Aims. The goal of this work is to analyse parameters of
multiple trans-Neptunian systems, observed with Herschel and Spitzer
space telescopes. Particularly, statistical analysis is done for
radiometric size and geometric albedo, obtained from photometric
observations, and for estimated bulk density.
Methods. We use Monte Carlo simulation to estimate the real
size distribution of TNOs. For this purpose, we expand the dataset of
diameters by adopting the Minor Planet Center database list with
available values of the absolute magnitude therein, and the albedo
distribution derived from Herschel radiometric measurements. We use the
2-sample Anderson-Darling non-parametric statistical method for
testing whether two samples of diameters, for binary and single TNOs,
come from the same distribution. Additionally, we use the Spearman's
coefficient as a measure of rank correlations between parameters.
Uncertainties of estimated parameters together with lack of data are
taken into account. Conclusions about correlations between parameters
are based on statistical hypothesis testing.
Results. We have found that the difference in size
distributions of multiple and single TNOs is biased by small objects.
The test on correlations between parameters shows that the effective
diameter of binary TNOs strongly correlates with heliocentric orbital
inclination and with magnitude difference between components of binary
system. The correlation between diameter and magnitude difference
implies that small and large binaries are formed by different
mechanisms. Furthermore, the statistical test indicates, although not
significant with the sample size, that a moderately strong correlation
exists between diameter and bulk density.
To appear in:
Astronomy and Astrophysics
For preprints, contact irina.kovalenko@iki.rssi.ru
or on the web at https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201730588
Taxonomy of TNOs and Centaurs as Seen From Spectroscopy
F. Merlin1, T. Hromakina2, D. Perna1, M.J. Hong1, and A. Alvarez-Candal3
1 LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, PSL Research University, CNRS, Sorbonne Universites, UPMC Univ. Paris 06, Univ. Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cite, 5 place Jules Janssen, 92195 Meudon, France
2 Institute of Astronomy, Kharkiv V.N. Karin National University, Sumska Str. 35, Kharkiv 61022, Ukraine.
3 Observatorio Nacional, R. Gal. Jose Cristino 77, 20921-400 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Taxonomy of Trans-Neptunian Objects (TNOs) and Centaurs has been made in
previous works using broadband filters in the visible and near infrared
ranges. This initial investigation led to the establishment of four
groups with the aim to provide the mean colors of the different classes
with possible links with any physical or chemical properties. However,
this taxonomy was only made with the Johnson-Cousins filter system and
the ESO
J,
H,
Ks filters combination, and any association with other
filter system is not yet available. We aim to edit complete visible to
near infrared taxonomy and extend this work to any possible filters
system. To do this, we generate mean spectra for each individual group,
from a data set of 43 spectra. This work also presents new spectra of
the TNO (38628) Huya, on which aqueous alteration has been suspected,
and the Centaur 2007 VH
305. To generate the mean spectra for each
taxonomical group, we first averaged the data for each of the four
taxonomical groups and checked that spectroscopic and photometric data
were consistent according to their relative errors. We obtained four
complete spectra corresponding to the different classes from 0.45 to
2.40 microns. Our results based on spectroscopy are in good agreements
with those obtained in photometry for the bluest (BB) and reddest (RR)
objects. At the contrary, no clear patterns appear for the two
intermediate groups (BR and IR). Both BR and IR mean-spectra are almost
intermixed, probably due to the fact that part of these objects have not
always clear affiliation to one particular taxonomical group. We provide
mean spectra that could be used to edit colors in different filters
system working in this wavelength range. This work clearly establish the
mean spectra of the BB and RR group while the two other groups need
probably further refinement.
Published in:
Astronomy and Astrophysics, 604, A86 (2017 August)
Available on the web at https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201730933
The Thermal Emission of Centaurs and Trans-Neptunian Objects at Millimeter Wavelengths from ALMA Observations
E. Lellouch1,
R. Moreno1,
T. Müller2,
S. Fornasier1,
P. Santos-Sanz3,
A. Moullet4,
M. Gurwell5,
J. Stansberry6,
R. Leiva1,7,
B. Sicardy1,
B. Butler8, and
J. Boissier9
1 LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, PSL Research University, CNRS, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ. Paris 06, Univ. Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 5 place Jules Janssen, 92195 Meudon, France
2 Max-Planck-Institut für Extraterrestrische Physik, Giessenbachstraße, 85748 Garching, Germany
3 Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía-CSIC, Glorieta de la Astronomía s/n, 18008-Granada, Spain
4 National Radio Astronomy Observatory 520 Edgemont Road 22903 Charlottesville, VA, USA
5 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
6 Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
7 Instituto de Astrofísica, Facultad de Física, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Av. Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Santiago, Chile
8 National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Socorro, NM 87801, USA
9 IRAM, Domaine Universitaire, 300 Rue de la Piscine, 38400 Saint-Martin-d'Hères, France
The sensitivity of ALMA makes it possible to detect thermal mm/submm
emission from small and/or distant solar system bodies at the sub-mJy
level. While the measured fluxes are primarily sensitive to the objects'
diameters, deriving precise sizes is somewhat hampered by the uncertain
effective emissivity at these wavelengths. Following recent work
presenting ALMA data for four trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs) with
satellites, we report on ALMA 233 GHz (1.29 mm) flux measurements of
four Centaurs (2002 GZ
32, Bienor, Chiron, Chariklo) and two other
TNOs (Huya and Makemake), sampling a range of sizes, albedos, and
compositions. These thermal fluxes are combined with previously
published fluxes in the mid/far infrared in order to derive their
relative emissivity at radio (mm/submm) wavelengths, using the Near
Earth Asteroid Standard Model (NEATM) and thermophysical models. We
reassess earlier thermal measurements of these and other objects -
including Pluto/Charon and Varuna - exploring, in particular, effects
due to non-spherical shape and varying apparent pole orientation
whenever information is available, and show that these effects can be
key for reconciling previous diameter determinations and correctly
estimating the spectral emissivities. We also evaluate the possible
contribution to thermal fluxes of established (Chariklo) or claimed
(Chiron) ring systems. For Chariklo, the rings do not impact the
diameter determinations by more than ∼ 5%; for Chiron, invoking a
ring system does not help in improving the consistency between the
numerous past size measurements. As a general conclusion, all the
objects, except Makemake, have radio emissivities significantly lower
than unity. Although the emissivity values show diversity, we do not
find any significant trend with physical parameters such as diameter,
composition, beaming factor, albedo, or color, but we suggest that the
emissivity could be correlated with grain size. The mean relative radio
emissivity is found to be 0.70±0.13, a value that we recommend for
the analysis of further mm/submm data.
To appear in:
Astronomy and Astrophysics
For preprints, contact emmanuel.lellouch@obspm.fr
or on the web at https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.06747
Was Planet 9 Captured in the Sun's Natal Star-forming Region?
Richard J. Parker1,2, Tim Lichtenberg3,4, and Sascha P. Quanz4,5
1 Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Sheffield, Hicks Building, Hounsfield Road, Sheffield, S3 7RH, UK
2 Royal Society Dorothy Hodgkin Fellow
3 Institute of Geophysics, ETH Zürich, Sonneggstrasse 5, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland
4 Institute for Astronomy, ETH Zürich, Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse 27, CH-8093, Zürich, Switzerland
5 National Center of Competence in Research "PlanetS", Sidlerstrasse 5, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
The presence of an unseen `Planet 9' on the outskirts of the Solar
system has been invoked to explain the unexpected clustering of the
orbits of several Edgeworth-Kuiper Belt Objects. We use N-body
simulations to investigate the probability that Planet 9 was a
free-floating planet (FFLOP) that was captured by the Sun in its birth
star-formation environment. We find that only 1-6% of FFLOPs
are ensnared by stars, even with the most optimal initial conditions for
capture in star-forming regions (one FFLOP per star, and highly
correlated stellar velocities to facilitate capture). Depending on the
initial conditions of the star-forming regions, only 5-10 of 10 000
planets are captured onto orbits that lie within the constraints for
Planet 9. When we apply an additional environmental constraint for Solar
system formation - namely the injection of short-lived radioisotopes
into the Sun's protoplanetary disc from supernovae - we find the
probability for the capture of Planet 9 to be almost zero.
Published in:
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 472, L75
For preprints, contact R.Parker@sheffield.ac.uk
or on the web at https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.00418
Details of Resonant Structures Within a Nice Model Kuiper Belt: Predictions for High-Perihelion TNO Detections
R.E. Pike1 and S.M. Lawler3
1 Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 10617, Taiwan
2 NRC-Herzberg Astronomy and Astrophysics, National Research Council of Canada, 5071 West Saanich Rd, Victoria, BC V9E 2E7, Canada
We analyze a detailed Nice model simulation of Kuiper Belt emplacement
from Brasser & Morbidelli 2013, where Neptune undergoes a high
eccentricity phase and migrates outward. In this work, which follows
from Pike et al. 2017, we specifically focus on the details of
structures within Neptune's mean motion resonances and in the high
pericenter population of simulated trans-Neptunian Objects (TNOs). We
find several characteristics of these populations which should be
observable in the distant Solar System in future large-scale TNO surveys
as a diagnostic of whether or not this mode of Neptune migration
occurred in the early Solar System. We find that the leading asymmetric
libration islands of the n:1 resonances are generally much more
populated than the trailing islands. We also find the non-resonant
high-q population of TNOs should have higher inclinations than the
low-q population due to the importance of Kozai cycling during their
emplacement histories. Finally, high-q TNOs should be present in
roughly equal numbers on either side of distant mean-motion resonances.
These predictions contrast with predictions from other Kuiper Belt
emplacement simulations, and will be testable by upcoming surveys.
Published in:
The Astronomical Journal, 154, 171 (2017 October)
Available on the web at
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....154..171P
Binary Stripping as a Plausible Origin of Correlated Pairs of Extreme Trans-Neptunian Objects
C. de la Fuente Marcos,1 R. de la Fuente Marcos1, and Sverre J. Aarseth2
1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid,
Ciudad Universitaria, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
2 Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge,
Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK
Asteroids that follow similar orbits may have a dynamical connection as
their current paths could be the result of a past interaction with a
massive perturber. The pair of extreme trans-Neptunian objects or ETNOs
(474640) 2004 VN
112-2013 RF
98 exhibits peculiar relative
orbital properties, including a difference in longitude of the ascending
node of just 1.61
° and 3.99
° in inclination. In addition,
their reflectance spectra are similar in the visible portion of the
spectrum. The origin of these similarities remains unclear. Neglecting
observational bias, viable scenarios that could explain this level of
coincidence include fragmentation and binary dissociation. Here, we
present results of extensive direct N-body simulations of close
encounters between wide binary ETNOs and one trans-Plutonian planet. We
find that wide binary ETNOs can dissociate during such interactions and
the relative orbital properties of the resulting unbound couples match
reasonably well those of several pairs of known ETNOs, including
474640-2013 RF
98. The possible presence of former binaries among
the known ETNOs has strong implications for the interpretation of the
observed anisotropies in the distributions of the directions of their
orbital poles and perihelia.
Published in:
Astrophysics and Space Science, 362, 198 (2017 November)
For preprints, contact nbplanet@ucm.es
or on the web at http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017Ap%26SS.362..198D
The HIP 79977 Debris Disk in Polarized Light
N. Engler1, H.M. Schmid1, Ch. Thalmann1, A. Boccaletti2,
A. Bazzon1, A. Baruffolo3, J.L. Beuzit4, R. Claudi3,
A. Costille5, S. Desidera3, K. Dohlen5, C. Dominik6,
M. Feldt7, T. Fusco8, C. Ginski9, D. Gisler10,
J.H. Girard11, R. Gratton3, T. Henning7, N. Hubin12,
M. Janson7, 13, M. Kasper12, Q. Kral21, M. Langlois14,5, E. Lagadec15, F. Ménard4, M.R. Meyer1, 16,
J. Milli11, D. Mouillet4, J. Olofsson17, 7, 20,
A. Pavlov7, J. Pragt18, P. Puget4, S.P. Quanz1,
R. Roelfsema18, B. Salasnich3, R. Siebenmorgen12,
E. Sissa3, M. Suarez12, J. Szulagyi1, M. Turatto3,
S. Udry19, and F. Wildi19
1 ETH Zurich, Institute for Astronomy, Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse 27, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
2 LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, PSL Research University, CNRS, Sorbonne, Universités, UPMC Univ. Paris 06, Univ. Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris, Cité, 5 place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex, France
3 INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Vicolo dell'Osservatorio 5, 35122 Padova, Italy
4 Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IPAG, F-38000 Grenoble, France
5 Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, LAM (Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille) UMR 7326, 13388, Marseille, France
6 Anton Pannekoek Astronomical Institute, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94249, 1090 GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
7 Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Königstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
8 ONERA, The French Aerospace Lab BP72, 29 avenue de la Division Leclerc, 92322 Châtillon Cedex, France
9 Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9513, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
10 Kiepenheuer-Institut für Sonnenphysik, Schneckstr. 6, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany
11 European Southern Observatory, Alonso de Cordova 3107, Casilla 19001 Vitacura, Santiago 19, Chile
12 European Southern Observatory, Karl Schwarzschild St, 2, 85748 Garching, Germany
13 Department of Astronomy, Stockholm University, AlbaNova University Center, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden
14 Centre de Recherche Astrophysique de Lyon, CNRS/ENSL Université Lyon 1, 9 av. Ch. André, 69561 Saint-Genis-Laval, France
15 Laboratoire Lagrange, UMR7293, Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis, CNRS, Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur, Boulevard de l'Observatoire, 06304 Nice, Cedex 4, France
16 Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan, 311 West Hall, 1085 S. University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
17 Instituto de Física y Astronomía, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Valparaíso, Av. Gran Bretaña 1111, Playa Ancha, Valparaíso, Chile
18 NOVA Optical Infrared Instrumentation Group at ASTRON, Oude Hoogeveensedijk 4, 7991 PD Dwingeloo, The Netherlands
19 Geneva Observatory, University of Geneva, Chemin des Mailettes 51, 1290 Versoix, Switzerland
20 ICM nucleus on protoplanetary disks, "Protoplanetary discs in ALMA Early Science", Chile
21 Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK
We present observations of the known edge-on debris disk around HIP 79977
(HD 146897, F star in Upper Sco, 123 pc), taken with the ZIMPOL
differential polarimeter of the SPHERE instrument in the Very Broad Band
filter (λ
c=735 nm, ∆λ = 290 nm) with a spatial
resolution of about 25 mas. We measure the polarization flux along and
perpendicular to the disk spine of the highly inclined disk for
projected separations between 0.2" (25 AU) and 1.6" (200 AU) and
investigate the diagnostic potential of such data with model
simulations. The polarized flux contrast ratio for the disk is
F
pol/F
∗ = (5.5 ±0.9) 10
−4. The surface brightness reaches
a maximum of 16.2 mag arcsec
−2 at a separation of 0.2"−0.5"
along the disk spine with a maximum surface brightness contrast of
7.64 mag arcsec
−2. The polarized flux has a minimum near the star
< 0.2" because no or only little polarization is produced by forward
or backward scattering in the disk section lying in front of or behind
the star. The data are modeled as a circular dust belt with an
inclination i=85(±1.5)
° and a radius between r
0 = 60 AU and
90 AU. The radial density dependence is described by (r/r
0)
α
with a steep power law index α = 5 inside r
0 and a more shallow
index α = −2.5 outside r
0. The scattering asymmetry factor lies
between g = 0.2 and 0.6 adopting a scattering angle-dependence for the
fractional polarization such as that for Rayleigh scattering. Our data
are qualitatively very similar to the case of AU Mic and they confirm
that edge-on debris disks have a polarization minimum at a position near
the star and a maximum near the projected separation of the main debris
belt. The comparison of the polarized flux contrast ratio
F
pol/F
∗ with the fractional infrared excess provides strong
constraints on the scattering albedo of the dust.
To appear in:
Astronomy & Astrophysics
For preprints, contact englern@phys.ethz.ch
or on the web at https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.00417
Newsletter Information
The
Distant EKOs Newsletter is dedicated to provide researchers with
easy and rapid access to current work regarding the Kuiper belt (observational
and theoretical studies), directly related objects (e.g., Pluto, Centaurs), and
other areas of study when explicitly applied to the Kuiper belt.
We accept submissions for the following sections:
- Abstracts of papers submitted, in press, or recently published in refereed journals
- Titles of conference presentations
- Thesis abstracts
- Short articles, announcements, or editorials
- Status reports of on-going programs
- Requests for collaboration or observing coordination
- Table of contents/outlines of books
- Announcements for conferences
- Job advertisements
- General news items deemed of interest to the Kuiper belt community
A
LaTeX
template for submissions is appended to each issue of the newsletter, and
is sent out regularly to the e-mail distribution list. Please use that
template, and send your submission to:
ekonews@boulder.swri.edu
The
Distant EKOs Newsletter is available on the World Wide Web at:
http://www.boulder.swri.edu/ekonews
Recent and back
issues of the Newsletter are archived there in various formats. The web
pages also contain other related information and links.
Distant EKOs is not a refereed publication, but is a tool for
furthering communication among people interested in Kuiper belt research.
Publication or listing of an article in the Newsletter or the web page does
not constitute an endorsement of the article's results or imply validity of its
contents. When referencing an article, please reference the original source;
Distant EKOs is not a substitute for peer-reviewed journals.
Moving ... ??
If you move or your e-mail address changes, please send the editor your new
address. If the Newsletter bounces back from an address for three consecutive
issues, the address will be deleted from the mailing list. All address
changes, submissions, and other correspondence should be sent to:
ekonews@boulder.swri.edu
File translated from
TEX
by
TTH,
version 4.10.
On 22 Dec 2017, 13:25.