NEWS, ANNOUNCEMENTS, COMMENTARY |
|
On the Insensitive Use of the Term "Planet 9" for Objects Beyond Pluto
We the undersigned wish to remind our colleagues that the IAU planet
definition adopted in 2006 has been controversial and is far from
universally accepted. Given this, and given the incredible
accomplishment of the discovery of Pluto, the harbinger of the solar
system's third zone - the Kuiper Belt - by planetary astronomer Clyde W. Tombaugh
in 1930, we the undersigned believe the use of the term "Planet 9"
for objects beyond Pluto is insensitive to Professor Tombaugh's legacy.
We further believe the use of this term should be discontinued in favor
of culturally and taxonomically neutral terms for such planets, such as
Planet X, Planet Next, or Giant Planet Five.
Paul Abell,
Michael Allison,
Nadine Barlow,
David Bartlett,
James Bauer,
Gordon Bjoraker,
Paul Byrne,
Eric Christiansen,
Rajani Dhingra,
Timothy Dowling,
David Dunham,
Tony L. Farnham,
Harold Geller,
Alvero Gonzalez,
David Grinspoon,
Will Grundy,
George Hindman,
Kampalayya M. Hiremath,
Brian Holler,
Stephanie Jarmak,
Martin Knapmeyer,
Rosaly Lopes,
Amy Lovell,
Ralph McNutt,
Phil Metzger,
Sripada Murty,
Michael Paul,
Kirby Runyon,
Ray Russell,
John Stansberry,
Alan Stern,
Mike Summers,
Henry Throop,
Hal Weaver,
Larry Wasserman,
Sloane Wiktorowicz
The full orbital database of the Outer Solar System
Origins Survey (OSSOS) has started appearing in the Minor Planet Center,
and will continue over the next month as many hundreds of TNO
orbits are released. The most convenient compilation, and the
important "OSSOS Survey simulator" will be released via the project
web pages at
http://www.ossos-survey.org
There were 164 new TNO discoveries announced since the previous issue of
Distant EKOs :
2014 HR208, 2015 DA249, 2015 DA250, 2015 DB249, 2015 DB250, 2015 DC249,
2015 DD249, 2015 DE249, 2015 DF249, 2015 DG249, 2015 DH249, 2015 DJ249,
2015 DK249, 2015 DL249, 2015 DM249, 2015 DN249, 2015 DO248, 2015 DO249,
2015 DP248, 2015 DP249, 2015 DQ248, 2015 DR248, 2015 DS248, 2015 DT249,
2015 DU248, 2015 DV248, 2015 DV249, 2015 DW248, 2015 DW249, 2015 DX248,
2015 DX249, 2015 DY248, 2015 DY249, 2015 DZ248, 2015 DZ249, 2015 GC55,
2015 GD55, 2015 GE55, 2015 GF54, 2015 GF55, 2015 GG54, 2015 GG55,
2015 GH54, 2015 GH55, 2015 GJ54, 2015 GJ55, 2015 GK54, 2015 GK55,
2015 GL54, 2015 GL55, 2015 GM54, 2015 GN54, 2015 GO54, 2015 GP54,
2015 GQ54, 2015 GR54, 2015 GS54, 2015 GT54, 2015 GU54, 2015 GV54,
2015 GW54, 2015 GX54, 2015 GY54, 2015 GZ54, 2015 KA174, 2015 KB174,
2015 KC173, 2015 KD173, 2015 KE173, 2015 KF173, 2015 KG173, 2015 KH173,
2015 KJ173, 2015 KK173, 2015 KL173, 2015 KM173, 2015 KN173, 2015 KO173,
2015 KP173, 2015 KQ173, 2015 KR173, 2015 KS173, 2015 KT173, 2015 KU173,
2015 KV173, 2015 KW173, 2015 KX173, 2015 RC278, 2015 RD278, 2015 RE278,
2015 RF278, 2015 RG277, 2015 RG278, 2015 RJ277, 2015 RR277, 2015 RS277,
2015 RT277, 2015 RU277, 2015 RV277, 2015 RX277, 2015 RY277, 2015 VA165,
2015 VA166, 2015 VA167, 2015 VB165, 2015 VB166, 2015 VB167, 2015 VC165,
2015 VC166, 2015 VC167, 2015 VD165, 2015 VD166, 2015 VE165, 2015 VE166,
2015 VF165, 2015 VF166, 2015 VG165, 2015 VG166, 2015 VH165, 2015 VH166,
2015 VJ164, 2015 VJ165, 2015 VJ166, 2015 VK164, 2015 VK165, 2015 VK166,
2015 VL164, 2015 VL165, 2015 VL166, 2015 VM164, 2015 VM165, 2015 VN164,
2015 VN165, 2015 VO164, 2015 VO165, 2015 VP164, 2015 VP165, 2015 VQ164,
2015 VQ165, 2015 VQ166, 2015 VR164, 2015 VR165, 2015 VR166, 2015 VS164,
2015 VS165, 2015 VS166, 2015 VT164, 2015 VT165, 2015 VT166, 2015 VU164,
2015 VU165, 2015 VU166, 2015 VV164, 2015 VV166, 2015 VW164, 2015 VW166,
2015 VX164, 2015 VX166, 2015 VY164, 2015 VY165, 2015 VY166, 2015 VZ164,
2015 VZ165, 2015 VZ166
and 30 new Centaur/SDO discoveries:
2014 VR39, 2015 DQ249, 2015 DS249, 2015 DT248, 2015 DU249, 2015 GA54,
2015 GA55, 2015 GB54, 2015 GB55, 2015 GY53, 2015 GZ53, 2015 KH172,
2015 KJ172, 2015 KY173, 2015 KZ173, 2015 RA278, 2015 RB278, 2015 RD277,
2015 RF277, 2015 RH277, 2015 RK277, 2015 RZ277, 2015 TG387, 2015 VE164,
2015 VF164, 2015 VM166, 2015 VN166, 2015 VO166, 2015 VP166, 2018 RR2
and 2 new Neptune Trojan discoveries:
2013 VX30,
2014 UU240
Reclassified objects:
2004 KV18 (NTrojan → TNO)
2014 FF72 (SDO → TNO)
2017 YK3 (SDO → TNO)
Objects recently assigned numbers:
2000 CN105 = (523588)
2001 QD298 = (523591)
2002 QX47 = (523597)
2003 UY413 = (523601)
2006 UO321 = (523615)
2007 PS45 = (523617)
2007 RH283 = (523620)
2007 RT15 = (523618)
2007 TG422 = (523622)
2008 CT190 = (523624)
2008 QB43 = (523627)
2008 SP266 = (523629)
2010 AH2 = (523634)
2010 DN93 = (523635)
2010 RE64 = (523639)
2010 RO64 = (523640)
2010 SS43 = (523642)
2010 TY53 = (523643)
2010 VK201 = (523645)
2010 VL201 = (523646)
2010 VV224 = (523647)
2010 VX11 = (523644)
2010 XZ78 = (523649)
2011 LZ28 = (523652)
2011 OA60 = (523653)
2011 VJ24 = (523655)
2012 DW98 = (523658)
2012 HG84 = (523659)
2013 FJ28 = (523672)
2013 FZ27 = (523671)
2013 MA12 = (523674)
2013 MZ11 = (523673)
2013 PV74 = (523675)
2013 UF15 = (523677)
2013 UL10 = (523676)
2013 XB26 = (523678)
2013 YJ151 = (523680)
2014 BV64 = (523681)
2014 CN23 = (523682)
2014 CP23 = (523683)
2014 CQ23 = (523684)
2014 DB143 = (523686)
2014 DF143 = (523687)
2014 DK143 = (523688)
2014 DL143 = (523689)
2014 DN143 = (523690)
2014 DO143 = (523691)
2014 EZ51 = (523692)
2014 FT71 = (523693)
2014 GD54 = (523698)
2014 GH54 = (523699)
2014 GM54 = (523700)
2014 GS53 = (523695)
2014 GW53 = (523696)
2014 GY53 = (523697)
2014 HB200 = (523704)
2014 HE200 = (523705)
2014 HF200 = (523706)
2014 HT199 = (523701)
2014 HW199 = (523702)
2014 HX199 = (523703)
2014 JB80 = (523708)
2014 JD80 = (523709)
2014 JF80 = (523710)
2014 JH80 = (523711)
2014 JS80 = (523712)
2014 JX80 = (523713)
2014 KR101 = (523714)
2014 KU101 = (523715)
2014 KW101 = (523716)
2014 KY101 = (523717)
2014 KZ101 = (523718)
2014 LM28 = (523719)
2014 LN28 = (523720)
2014 LR28 = (523721)
2014 LV28 = (523722)
2014 MA70 = (523724)
2014 MC70 = (523725)
2014 MJ70 = (523726)
2014 MY69 = (523723)
2014 NW65 = (523727)
2014 OH394 = (523730)
2014 OK394 = (523731)
2014 OX393 = (523729)
2014 PR70 = (523733)
2014 QA442 = (523736)
2014 QV441 = (523734)
2014 QX441 = (523735)
2014 SH349 = (523738)
2014 TA86 = (523743)
2014 TC86 = (523744)
2014 TD86 = (523745)
2014 TV85 = (523740)
2014 TY85 = (523741)
2014 TZ33 = (523739)
2014 TZ85 = (523742)
2014 UP224 = (523748)
2014 UR224 = (523749)
2014 US224 = (523750)
2014 UT114 = (523746)
2014 UU224 = (523751)
2014 VU37 = (523752)
2014 WC510 = (523764)
2014 WD509 = (523756)
2014 WD510 = (523765)
2014 WF510 = (523766)
2014 WH509 = (523757)
2014 WH510 = (523767)
2014 WJ509 = (523758)
2014 WK509 = (523759)
2014 WQ509 = (523760)
2014 WQ510 = (523768)
2014 WS510 = (523769)
2014 WU509 = (523761)
2014 WV508 = (523753)
2014 WX508 = (523754)
2014 WX509 = (523762)
2014 WZ508 = (523755)
2014 WZ509 = (523763)
2014 XO40 = (523770)
2014 XP40 = (523771)
2014 XR40 = (523772)
2014 XS40 = (523773)
2014 XV40 = (523774)
2014 YB50 = (523776)
2014 YF50 = (523777)
2014 YK50 = (523778)
Objects recently assigned names:
2010 EK139 = Dziewanna
Deleted objects (removed from MPC lists, but both still appear in the JPL Small-Body Database):
2015 GZ53
1997 UF25
Current number of TNOs: 2100 (including Pluto)
Current number of Centaurs/SDOs: 795
Current number of Neptune Trojans: 18
Out of a total of 2913 objects:
710 have measurements from only one opposition
705 of those have had no measurements for more than a year
370 of those have arcs shorter than 10 days
(for more details, see:
http://www.boulder.swri.edu/ekonews/objects/recov_stats.jpg )
PAPERS ACCEPTED TO JOURNALS |
|
E.V. Pitjeva1 and N.P. Pitjev1,2
1 Institute of Applied Astronomy of Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia
2 St. Petersburg State University, Petrodvoretz, Russia
The Kuiper belt includes tens of thousand of large bodies and millions
of smaller objects. The main part of the belt objects is located in the
annular zone between 39.4 and 47.8 au from the Sun; the boundaries
correspond to the average distances for orbital resonances 3:2 and 2:1
with the motion of Neptune. One-dimensional, two-dimensional, and
discrete rings to model the total gravitational attraction of numerous
belt objects are considered. The discrete rotating model most correctly
reflects the real interaction of bodies in the Solar system. The masses
of the model rings were determined within EPM2017 - the new version of
ephemerides of planets and the Moon at IAA RAS - by fitting spacecraft
ranging observations. The total mass of the Kuiper belt was calculated
as the sum of the masses of the 31 largest trans-Neptunian objects
directly included in the simultaneous integration and the estimated mass
of the model of the discrete ring of TNO. The total mass is (1.97 ±0.35) ×10
−2 m
⊕. The gravitational influence of the
Kuiper belt on Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune exceeds at times the
attraction of the hypothetical 9th planet with a mass of ∼ 10m
⊕ at the distances assumed for it. It is necessary to take
into account the gravitational influence of the Kuiper belt when
processing observations and only then to investigate residual
discrepancies to discover a possible influence of a distant large
planet.
Published in:
Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 130, 57
(2018 September)
For preprints, contact evp@iaaras.ru
or on the web at http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018CeMDA.130...57P
Interplanetary Dust Delivery of Water to the Atmospheres of Pluto and Triton
A.R. Poppe1 and M. Horányi2
1 Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California at Berkeley, USA
2 LASP/Dept. of Physics, University of Colorado at Boulder, USA
Both Pluto and Triton possess thin, N
2-dominated atmospheres
controlled by sublimation of surface ices.
We aim to constrain the influx and ablation of interplanetary dust
grains into the atmospheres of both Pluto and Triton in order to
estimate the rate at which oxygen-bearing species are introduced into
both atmospheres.
We use (i) an interplanetary dust dynamics model to calculate the flux
and velocity distributions of interplanetary dust grains relevant for
both Pluto and Triton and (ii) a model for the ablation of
interplanetary dust grains in the atmospheres of both Pluto and Triton.
We sum the individual ablation profiles over the incoming mass and
velocity distributions of interplanetary dust grains in order to
determine the vertical structure and net deposition of water to both
atmospheres.
Our results show that < 2% of silicate grains ablate at either Pluto
or Triton while approximately 75% and > 99% of water ice grains
ablate at Pluto and Triton, respectively. From ice grains, we calculate
net water influxes to Pluto and Triton of ≈ 3.8 kg day
−1
(8.5×10
3 H
2O cm
−2 s
−1) and ≈ 370 kg day
−1
(6.2×10
5 H
2O cm
−2 s
−1), respectively.
The significant difference in total water deposition between Pluto and
Triton is due to the presence of Triton within Neptune's gravity well,
which both enhances IDP fluxes due to gravitational focusing and
accelerates grains before entry into Triton's atmosphere, thereby
causing more efficient ablation.
We conclude that water deposition from dust ablation plays only a minor
role at Pluto due to its relatively low flux. At Triton, water
deposition from IDPs is more significant and may play a role in the
alteration of atmospheric and ionospheric chemistry. We also suggest
that meteoric smoke and smaller, un-ablated grains may serve as
condensation nuclei for the formation of hazes at both worlds.
To appear in:
Astronomy and Astrophysics, 617, L5 (2018 September)
For preprints, contact poppe@ssl.berkeley.edu
or on the web at https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833980
The New Horizons Kuiper Belt Extended Mission
S.A. Stern1, H.A. Weaver2, and J.R. Spencer1, H.A. Elliott3,
and the New Horizons Team
1 Southwest Research Institute, 1050 Walnut St., Suite 300, Boulder, CO 80302, USA
2 Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel, MD 20723, USA
3 Southwest Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, TX 78238, USA
The central objective of the New Horizons prime mission was to make the
first exploration of Pluto and its system of moons. Following that, New
Horizons has been approved for its first extended mission, which has the
objectives of extensively studying the Kuiper Belt environment,
observing numerous Kuiper Belt Objects (KBOs) and Centaurs in unique
ways, and making the first close flyby of the KBO 486958 2014 MU
69. This
review summarizes the objectives and plans for this approved mission
extension, and briefly looks forward to potential objectives for
subsequent extended missions by New Horizons.
Published in:
Space Science Reviews, 214, 77 (2018 June)
For preprints, contact astern@swri.edu
or on the web at http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018SSRv..214...77S
Great Expectations:
Plans and Predictions for New Horizons Encounter with Kuiper Belt Object
2014 MU69 ("Ultima Thule")
J.M. Moore1, W.B. McKinnon2, D.P. Cruikshank1,
G.R. Gladstone3, J.R. Spencer4, S.A. Stern4,
H.A. Weaver5, K.N. Singer4, M.R. Showalter6,
W.M. Grundy7, R.A. Beyer1,6, O.L. White1,6,
R.P. Binzel8, M.W. Buie4, B.J. Buratti9,
A.F. Cheng5, C. Howett4, C.B. Olkin4, A.H. Parker4,
S.B. Porter4, P.M. Schenk10, H.B. Throop11,
A.J. Verbiscer12, L.A. Young4, S.D. Benecchi11,
V.J. Bray13, C.L. Chavez1,6, R.D. Dhingra14,
A.D. Howard15, T.R. Lauer16, C.M. Lisse5,
S.J. Robbins4, K.D. Runyon5, and O.M. Umurhan1,6
1 National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Ames Research Center, Space Science Division, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA
2 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
3 Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX 78238, USA
4 Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, CO 80302, USA
5 Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD 20723, USA
6 The SETI Institute, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA
7 Lowell Observatory, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA
8 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
9 NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA 91109 USA
10 Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, TX 77058, USA
11 Planetary Science Institute, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA
12 Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA
13 Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
14 Department of Physics, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, 83843, USA
15 Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA
16 National Optical Astronomy Observatory, Tucson, AZ 85726, USA
The New Horizons encounter with the cold classical Kuiper Belt object
2014 MU
69 (informally named "Ultima Thule", hereafter Ultima) on
1 January 2019 will be the first time a spacecraft has ever closely
observed one of the free-orbiting small denizens of the Kuiper Belt.
Related to but not thought to have formed in the same region of the
solar system as the comets that been explored so far, it will also be
the most distant, and most primitive body yet visited by spacecraft. In
this letter we begin with a brief overview of cold classical Kuiper Belt
objects, of which Ultima is a prime example. We give a short preview of
our encounter plans. We note what is currently known about Ultima from
Earth-based observations. We then review our expectations and
capabilities to evaluate Ultima's composition, surface geology,
structure, near space environment, small moons, rings, and the search
for activity.
To appear in:
Geophysical Research Letters
Preprints available or on the web at https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.02118
"TNOs are Cool": A Survey of the Trans-Neptunian Region XIV.
Size/Albedo Characterization of the Haumea Family Observed with Herschel
and Spitzer
E. Vilenius1,2, J. Stansberry3, T. Müller2,
M. Mueller4,5, C. Kiss6,
P. Santos-Sanz7, M. Mommert8,9,10,
A. Pál6,
E. Lellouch11,
J. L. Ortiz7,
N. Peixinho12,
A. Thirouin10,
P.S. Lykawka13,
J. Horner14,
R. Duffard7,
S. Fornasier11,15, and A. Delsanti16
1 Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 3, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
2 Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik, Postfach 1312, Giessenbachstr., 85741 Garching, Germany
3 Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
4 SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Postbus 800, 9700 AV Groningen, the Netherlands
5 UNS-CNRS-Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur, Laboratoire Cassiopeé, BP 4229, 06304 Nice Cedex 04, France
6 Konkoly Observatory, Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences, Konkoly Thege 15-17, H-1121 Budapest, Hungary
7 Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (CSIC), Glorieta de la Astronomía s/n, 18008-Granada, Spain
8 Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V., Institute of Planetary Research, Rutherfordstr. 2, 12489 Berlin, Germany
9 Northern Arizona University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, PO Box 6010, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA
10 Lowell Observatory, 1400 W Mars Hill Rd, 86001, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
11 LESIA-Observatoire de Paris, CNRS, UPMC Univ. Paris 06, Univ. Paris-Diderot, France
12 CITEUC - Centre for Earth and Space Science Research of the University of Coimbra, Observatório Astronómico da Universidade de Coimbra, 3030-004 Coimbra, Portugal
13 School of Interdisciplinary Social and Human Sciences, Kindai University, Shinkamikosaka 228-3, Higashiosaka-shi, Osaka, 577-0813, Japan
14 Computational Engineering and Science Research Centre, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland 4350, Australia
15 Univ. Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 4 rue Elsa Morante, 75205 Paris, France
16 Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, LAM (Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille) UMR 7326, 13388, Marseille, France
A group of trans-Neptunian objects (TNO) are dynamically related to the
dwarf planet 136108 Haumea. Ten of them show strong indications of water
ice on their surfaces, are assumed to have resulted from a collision,
and are accepted as the only known TNO collisional family. Nineteen
other dynamically similar objects lack water ice absorptions and are
hypothesized to be dynamical interlopers. We have made observations to
determine sizes and geometric albedos of six of the accepted Haumea
family members and one dynamical interloper. Ten other dynamical
interlopers have been measured by previous works. We compare the
individual and statistical properties of the family members and
interlopers, examining the size and albedo distributions of both groups.
We also examine implications for the total mass of the family and their
ejection velocities. We use far-infrared space-based telescopes to
observe the target TNOs near their thermal peak and combine these data
with optical magnitudes to derive sizes and albedos using radiometric
techniques. Using measured and inferred sizes together with ejection
velocities we determine the power-law slope of ejection velocity as a
function of effective diameter. The detected Haumea family members have
a diversity of geometric albedos ∼ 0.3-0.8, which are higher than
geometric albedos of dynamically similar objects without water ice. The
median geometric albedo for accepted family members is
p
V=0.48
−0.18+0.28, compared to 0.08
−0.05+0.07 for the
dynamical interlopers. In the size range D=175−300 km, the slope of
the cumulative size distribution is q=3.2
−0.4+0.7 for accepted
family members, steeper than the q=2.0±0.6 slope for the dynamical
interlopers with D < 500 km. The total mass of Haumea's moons and family
members is 2.4% of Haumea's mass. The ejection velocities required to
emplace them on their current orbits show a dependence on diameter, with
a power-law slope of 0.21-0.50.
To appear in:
Astronomy & Astrophysics
For preprints, contact vilenius@mps.mpg.de
or on the web at https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201732564
Solar System Science with the Wide-Field InfraRed Survey Telescope (WFIRST)
B.J. Holler1, S.N. Milam2, J.M. Bauer3,4, C. Alcock5,
M.T. Bannister6, G.L. Bjoraker2, D. Bodewits3, A.S. Bosh7,
M.W. Buie8, T.L. Farnham3, N. Haghighipour9,
P.S. Hardersen10, A.W. Harris11, C.M. Hirata12,
H.H. Hsieh13,14, M.S.P. Kelley3, M.M. Knight3, E.A. Kramer4,
A. Longobardo15, C.A. Nixon2, E. Palomba15, S. Protopapa3,8,
L.C. Quick16, D. Ragozzine17, V. Reddy18, J.D. Rhodes4,
A.S. Rivkin19, G. Sarid20, A.A. Sickafoose21,7, A.A. Simon2,
C.A. Thomas22, D.E. Trilling22, and R.A. West4
1 Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
2 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 8800 Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA
3 Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
4 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
5 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
6 Astrophysics Research Centre, Queen?s University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK
7 Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, MIT, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
8 Southwest Research Institute, 1050 Walnut Street, Suite 300, Boulder, CO 80302, USA
9 Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii-Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA
10 University of North Dakota, Department of Space Studies, 4149 University Avenue, Stop 9008, 530 Clifford Hall, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA
11 MoreData! Inc., 4603 Orange Knoll Avenue, La Canada, CA 91011, USA
12 Center for Cosmology and Astro Particle Physics (CCAPP), The Ohio State University, 191 West Woodruff Lane, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
13 Planetary Science Institute, 1700 East Fort Lowell Road, Suite 106, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA
14 Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica, P.O. Box 23-141, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
15 INAF Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali, via Fosso del Cavaliere 100, Rome, Italy
16 Smithsonian Institution, National Air and Space Museum, Center for Earth and Planetary Studies, Independence Avenue at 6th Street, SW, Washington, DC, 20560, USA
17 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, N283 ESC, Provo, UT 84602, USA
18 Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, 1629 E University Boulevard, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
19 Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, 11101 Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel, MD 20723, USA
20 Florida Space Institute, University of Central Florida, 12354 Research Parkway, Orlando, FL 32826, USA
21 South African Astronomical Observatory, P.O. Box 9, 7935 Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa
22 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Northern Arizona University, P.O. Box 6010, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA
We present a community-led assessment of the solar system investigations
achievable with NASA's next-generation space telescope, the Wide Field
InfraRed Survey Telescope (WFIRST). WFIRST will provide imaging,
spectroscopic, and coronagraphic capabilities from 0.43-2.0 μm and
will be a potential contemporary and eventual successor to JWST. Surveys
of irregular satellites and minor bodies are where WFIRST will excel
with its 0.28 deg
2 field of view Wide Field Instrument (WFI).
Potential ground-breaking discoveries from WFIRST could include
detection of the first minor bodies orbiting in the Inner Oort Cloud,
identification of additional Earth Trojan asteroids, and the discovery
and characterization of asteroid binary systems similar to Ida/Dactyl.
Additional investigations into asteroids, giant planet satellites,
Trojan asteroids, Centaurs, Kuiper Belt Objects, and comets are
presented. Previous use of astrophysics assets for solar system science
and synergies between WFIRST, LSST, JWST, and the proposed NEOCam
mission are discussed. We also present the case for implementation of
moving target tracking, a feature that will benefit from the heritage of
JWST and enable a broader range of solar system observations.
To appear in:
Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instrumentation, and Systems
Preprints on the web at https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.02763
Dynamical Effects on the Classical Kuiper Belt during the Excited-Neptune Model
R.S. Ribeiro1,2, R. Gomes2, A. Morbidelli3, and E. Vieira Neto1
1 São Paulo State University, Av. Dr. Ariberto Pereira da Cunha, 333 - Pedregulho, Guaratinguetá - SP, 12516-410, Brazil
2 Observatório Nacional, Rua General José Cristino 77, CEP 20921-400, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
3 Laboratoire Lagrange, UMR7293, Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur, Boulevard de l'Observatoire, 06304 Nice Cedex 4, France
The link between the dynamical evolution of the giant planets and the
Kuiper Belt orbital structure can provide clues and insight about the
dynamical history of the Solar System. The classical region of the
Kuiper Belt has two populations (the cold and hot populations) with
completely different physical and dynamical properties. These properties
have been explained in the framework of a sub-set of the simulations of
the
Nice Model, in which Neptune remained on a low-eccentricity
orbit (Neptune's eccentricity is never larger than 0.1) throughout the
giant planet instability (Nesvorný 2015a,b). However, recent
simulations (Gomes et al. 2018) have showed that the remaining
Nice model simulations, in which Neptune temporarily acquires a
large-eccentricity orbit (larger than 0.1), are also consistent with the
preservation of the cold population (inclination smaller than 4 degrees),
if the latter formed
in situ. However, the resulting
cold population showed in many of the simulations eccentricities
larger than those observed for the real population. The purpose of this
work is to discuss the dynamical effects on the Kuiper belt region due
to an excited Neptune phase. We focus on a short period of time, of
about six hundred thousand years, which is characterized by Neptune's
large eccentricity and smooth migration with a slow precession of
Neptune's perihelion. This phase was observed during a full simulation
of the
Nice Model (Gomes et al. 2018) just after the last jump of
Neptune's orbit due to an encounter with another planet. We show that if
self-gravity is considered in the disk, the precession rate of the
particles' longitude of perihelion ϖ is slowed down, which in
turn speeds up the cycle of ϖ
N−ϖ (the subscript
N
referring to Neptune), associated to the particles' eccentricity
evolution. This, combined with the effect of mutual scattering among the
bodies, which spreads all orbital elements, allows some objects to
return to low eccentricities. However, we show that if the cold
population originally had a small total mass, this effect is negligible.
Thus, we conclude that the only possibilities to keep at low
eccentricity some cold-population objects during a high-eccentricity
phase of Neptune are that (i) either Neptune's precession was rapid, as
suggested by Batygin et al. (2011) or (ii) Neptune's slow precession
phase was long enough to allow some particles to experience a full
secular cycle of ϖ−ϖ
N.
To appear in:
Icarus
For preprints, contact rafanw72@gmail.com
or on the web at http://arxiv.org/abs/1808.02146
The Threat of Centaurs for Terrestrial Planets and Their Orbital Evolution as Impactors
M.A. Galiazzo1, E.A. Silber2, and R. Dvorak1
1 Department of Astrophysics, University of Vienna, Turkenschantzstrasse 17, 1180, Vienna, Austria
2 Department of Environmental, Earth and Planetary Sciences, Brown University, 324 Brook St., Providence, RI, 02912, USA
Centaurs are the solar system objects whose orbits are found between
those of the giant planets. They originate mainly from the
Trans-Neptunian objects, and are among the sources of Near-Earth
Objects. Thus, it is crucial to understand their orbital evolution which
in some cases might end in collision with terrestrial planets and
produce catastrophic events. We study the orbital evolution of the
Centaurs toward the inner solar system, and estimate the number of close
encounters and impacts with the terrestrial planets after the Late Heavy
Bombardment assuming a steady state population of Centaurs. We also
estimate the possible crater sizes. We compute the approximate amount of
water released: on the Earth, which is about 10
−5 the total water
present now. We also found subregions of the Centaurs where the possible
impactors originate from. While crater sizes could extend up to hundreds
of kilometers in diameter given the presently known population of
Centaurs the majority of the craters would be less than ∼ 10 km. For all
the planets and an average impactor size of ∼ 12 km in diameter, the
average impact frequency since the Late Heavy Bombardment is one every
∼ 1.9 Gyr for the Earth and 2.1 Gyr for Venus. For smaller bodies (e.g.
> 1 km), the impact frequency is one every 14.4 Myr for the Earth,
13.1 Myr for Venus and, 46.3 for Mars, in the recent solar system. Only 53%
of the Centaurs can enter into the terrestrial planet region and ∼ 7% can
interact with terrestrial planets.
To appear in:
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Available on the web at https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2614
Rings Under Close Encounters with the Giant Planets:
Chariklo versus Chiron
R.A.N. Araujo1, O.C. Winter1, and R. Sfair1
1 UNESP - São Paulo State University, Grupo de Dinâmica Orbital e Planetologia, CEP 12516-410, Guaratinguetá, SP, Brazil
In 2014, the discovery of two well-defined rings around the Centaur
(10199) Chariklo were announced. This was the first time that such
structures were found around a small body. In 2015, it was proposed that
the Centaur (2060) Chiron may also have a ring. In a previous study, we
analyzed how close encounters with giant planets would affect the rings
of Chariklo. The most likely result is the survival of the rings. In the
present work, we broaden our analysis to (2060) Chiron. In addition to
Chariklo, Chiron is currently the only known Centaur with a presumed
ring. By applying the same method as Araujo, Sfair and Winter (2016), we
performed numerical integrations of a system composed of 729 clones of
Chiron, the Sun, and the giant planets. The number of close encounters
that disrupted the ring of Chiron during one half-life of the study
period was computed. This number was then compared to the number of
close encounters for Chariklo. We found that the probability of Chiron
losing its ring due to close encounters with the giant planets is about
six times higher than that for Chariklo. Our analysis showed that,
unlike Chariklo, Chiron is more likely to remain in an orbit with a
relatively low inclination and high eccentricity. Thus, we found that
the bodies in Chiron-like orbits are less likely to retain rings than
those in Chariklo-like orbits. Overall, for observational purposes, we
conclude that the bigger bodies in orbits with high inclinations and low
eccentricities should be prioritized.
Published in:
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 479, 4770
(2018 October)
For preprints, contact ran.araujo@gmail.com
or on the web at https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.02096
Measuring the Severity of Close Encounters Between Ringed Small Bodies and Planets
Jeremy Wood1, 2, Jonti Horner3, 4, Tobias C. Hinse5, and Stephen C. Marsden2
1 Hazard Community and Technical College, Community College Drive Hazard, KY 41701, USA
2 Computational Engineering and Science Research Centre, University of Southern Queensland West St, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia
3 University of Southern Queensland, Computational Engineering and Science Research Centre West St, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia
4 Australian Centre for Astrobiology, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
5 Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, 776 Daedukdae-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-348, Republic of Korea
Rings have recently been discovered around the TNO 136108 Haumea
and the Centaur 10199 Chariklo. Rings are also suspected around
the Centaur 2060 Chiron. As planetary close encounters with ringed
small bodies can affect ring longevity, we previously measured the
severity of such encounters of Chariklo and Chiron using the minimum
encounter distance, d
min. The value of d
min which separates
noticeable encounters from non-noticeable encounters we called the "Ring
Limit", R. R was then approximated as ten tidal disruption
distances, 10R
td. In this work, we seek to find analytical
expressions for R which fully account for the effects of the planet
mass, small body mass, m
s, ring orbital radius, r, and velocity at
infinity, v
∞, for fictitious ringed Centaurs using ranges 2×10
20 kg ≤ m
s ≤ 1 Pluto Mass and 25,000 km ≤ r ≤ 100,000 km.
To accomplish this, we use numerical integration to
simulate close encounters between each giant planet and ringed
Centaurs in the three-body planar problem. The results show that R
has a lower bound of approximately 1.8 R
td. We compare analytical
and experimental R values for a fictitious Haumea, Chariklo and Chiron
with r=50,000 km. The agreement is excellent for Haumea, but weaker
for Chariklo and Chiron. The agreement is best for Jupiter and Saturn.
The ring limits of the real Haumea, Chariklo and Chiron are < 4R
td.
Experimental R values for the fictitious bodies make better
approximations for the R values of the real bodies than does
10R
td. Analytical values make good first approximations.
To appear in:
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 480, 4183
(2018 November)
Available on the web at https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2047
PAPERS RECENTLY SUBMITTED TO JOURNALS |
|
Evidence for Color Dichotomy in the Primordial Neptunian Trojan Population
Hsing Wen Lin1, David W. Gerdes1,2,
Stephanie J. Hamilton1, Fred C. Adams1 et al.
1 Department of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 USA
2 Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 USA
In the current model of early Solar System evolution, the stable members
of the Jovian and Neptunian Trojan populations were captured into
resonance from the protoplanetesimal disk during the outward migration
of the giant planets. As a result, both Jovian and Neptunian Trojans
share a common origin with the primordial disk population, whose other
surviving members constitute today's trans-Neptunian object (TNO)
populations. The cold classical TNOs are ultra-red, while the
dynamically excited "hot" population of TNOs contains a mixture of red
and blue objects. In contrast, Jovian and Neptunian Trojans are observed
to be blue. While the absence of ultra-red Jovian Trojans can be readily
explained by the sublimation of volatile material from their surfaces
due to the high flux of solar radiation at 5 AU, the lack of red
Neptunian Trojans presents both a puzzle and a challenge to formation
models. In this work we report the discovery by the Dark Energy Survey
(DES) of two new dynamically stable L4 Neptunian Trojans, 2013 VX30 and
2014 UU240, both with inclinations > 30 degrees, making them the
highest-inclination known stable Neptunian Trojans. We have measured the
colors of these and three other dynamically stable Neptunian Trojans
previously observed by DES, and find that 2013 VX30 is ultra-red, the
first such Neptunian Trojan in its class. As such, 2013 VX30 may be a
"missing link" between the Trojan and TNO populations. Using a
simulation of the DES TNO detection efficiency, we find that there are
162 ±73 Trojans with H
r < 10 at the L4 Lagrange point of Neptune.
Moreover, the blue-to-red Neptunian Trojan population ratio should be
higher than 5:1. Based on this result, we discuss the possible origin of
the red Neptunian Trojan population and its implications for the
formation history of Neptunian Trojans.
Submitted to:
Icarus
For preprints, contact hsingwel@umich.edu
or on the web at https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09696
Chasing New Horizons: Inside the Epic First Mission to Pluto
by Alan Stern and David Grinspoon
Picador Press, 2018. 320 pages
https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781250098962
Contents:
Preface: Inside the Farthest Exploration in History
Introduction: Out of Lock
1. Dreams of a Grand Tour
2. The Pluto Underground
3. Ten Years in the Wilderness
4. The Undead
5. New Horizons at Last?
6. Building the Bird
7. Bringing It All Together
8. A Prayer Before You Go
9. Going Supersonic
10. To Jupiter and the Ocean of Space Beyond
11. Battle Plan Pluto
12. Into Unknown Danger
13. On Approach
14. July 4th Fireworks
15. Showtime
16. Everest
17. Onward New Horizons
Coda
. .
Pluto and Lowell Observatory: A History of Discovery at Flagstaff
by Kevin Schindler and Will Grundy
with Contributions by Annette & Alden Tombaugh,
W. Lowell Putnam, S. Alan Stern, Jeff Hall, and Gerard van Belle
The History Press, 2018. 174 pages
https://www.arcadiapublishing.com/Products/9781625859792
Chapters:
1. An exercise in trial and error
2. integrating the search
3. Precision and planning
4. Paydirt
5. Companion
6. Shadows in the night
7. Setting the stage for a mission
8. Pluto explored!
9. Home of Pluto
Presentations at the 50th DPS meeting
2018 October 21-26, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
The following are Kuiper belt related presentations I found in the DPS program.
(Apologies for any that I missed.) Please note that in the "Conference Information"
in the next section, I also list all the Kuiper belt related
workshops happening at the DPS.
Tuesday, October 23
Session 208 (3:00-3:45). Gerard P. Kuiper Prize
- The Transneptunian Belt. Past, Present and Future (Julio Fernandez)
Session 221 (3:35-6:05). iPosters
- Ammonia on Pluto: its detection and implications (Dalle Ore)
- The Pluto System story told by resonances (De Santana)
Wednesday, October 24
Session 302 (8:30-9:35). Centaurs/TNOs I: Observational Surveys
- OSSOS observes planet-formation structure in the main Kuiper Belt (Gladman)
- OSSOS: The Missing Small Members of the Haumea Family (Pike)
- OSSOS exposes the complex size-frequency distribution of the main Kuiper Belt (Kavelaars)
- Col-OSSOS: The Compositional Structure of the Protoplanetesimal Disk (Fraser)
- Lightcurves of the Dynamically Cold Classical Trans-Neptunian Objects (Thirouin)
- A Combined Study of Extreme Trans-Neptunian Objects From Three Surveys and Implications for Planet Nine (Hamilton)
Session 305 (10:00-12:05). Centaurs/TNOs II: Dynamics, Origins, Theory
- Tightly-bound transneptunian binaries have prograde mutual orbits (Grundy)
- K2 light curves of eight Centaurs (Marton)
- Exploring Gravitational Collapse of a Pebble Cloud - A Route to TNO Binaries (Robinson)
- Bayesian Modeling of the Formation of the Haumea Family (Proudfoot)
- Equilibrium Figure of a Rapidly Rotating, Differentiated Haumea (Dunham)
- Searching for More Collisional Families in the Kuiper Belt (Ragozzine)
- Finding a Lower Bound on the Ring Limit for Planetary Close Encounters with Ringed Centaurs (Wood)
- Searching for KBO Binaries in the HST Archive (Smith)
- A Saturnian horseshoe coorbital & predictions for temporary coorbitals of the giant planets (Alexandersen)
- Exploring the Kuiper Belt Close to Home: A Mission to Explore Centaurs (Stern)
- Evidence for Very Early Migration of the Solar System Planets (Nesvorny)
- How KBO bulk density constrains their formation time (Bierson)
Session 311 (4:10-6:05). Centaurs/TNOs Posters
- The 2017 occultation by Vanth: a revised analysis (Bosh)
- The mass and density of the dwarf planet 2007 OR10 (Kiss)
- Searches for KBO Binaries using New Horizons LORRI (Weaver)
- A New, Unusual, and Diagnostic Band in Near-Infrared Spectra of Laboratory Ice Samples and Triton (Tegler)
- Commissioning of the Transneptunian Automated Occultation Survey - TAOS II (Lehner)
- Searching for activity on 15 Centaurs discovered in the Pan-STARRS detection catalog (Lilly)
- Search for a Pluto-like Satellite System Around Eris (Murray)
- A New Inner Oort Cloud Object (Trujillo)
Session 314 (4:10-6:05). Pluto System Posters
- The highest spatial resolution compositional maps of Pluto and what they tell us about surface composition and geology (Earle)
- Pluto's atmosphere with ALMA: disk-resolved observations of CO and HCN, and first detection of HNC (Lellouch)
Session 315 (4:10-6:05). iPosters
- Signatures of a low perihelion Planet 9 on the classical Kuiper belt and distant TNOs (Gomes)
- Rings under close encounters with the giant planets: Chariklo vs Chiron (Sfair)
- A Database of Fluxes and Albedos of Kuiper Belt Objects at 3.6 and 4.5 μm from Observations with the Spitzer Space Telescope (Perkins)
Friday, October 26
Session 502 (8:30-10:00). Pluto System I: Atmosphere and Surfaces
- The 15-AUG-2018 stellar occultation by Pluto: evidence for and against changes in haze opacity and atmospheric oblateness (Young)
- Pluto's atmosphere after New Horizons: results from stellar occultations in 2017 and 2018 (Sickafoose)
- Retrieval of Haze Properties in Pluto's Atmosphere from New Horizons Observations (Fan)
- Pluto's Minimum Pressure in the Current Season from a Thermophysical Model (Johnson)
- Haze formation on Pluto on million-year timescales (Young)
- Resolved Thermal Images of Pluto and Charon with ALMA (Butler)
- Triton: Atmosphere and Surface Observed with ALMA and Comparison with Pluto (Gurwell)
- Radiometric Polarization Anomalies on Pluto's Winter Night (Linscott)
- Ultraviolet Reflectance of Charon (Parker)
Session 506 (10:30-12:05). Pluto System II: Composition and Geology
- Are multiple coloring agents present across the surface of Pluto and its large satellite Charon? (Protopapa)
- Evidence of local CH4 stratification on Pluto from New Horisons LEISA data and a complete N2 ice map (Schmitt)
- Laboratory study of ammonia indices of refraction with water ice (Roser)
- Cryovolcanic Constructs on Pluto (Singer)
- Recent cryovolcanism on Pluto (Cruikshank)
- Prebiotic Chemistry of Pluto (Cruikshank)
- Long-term Evolution of Sputnik Planitia: Cryo-clastic Eruptions and their Implications (Stansberry)
- The Nature and Origin of Charon's Smooth Plains (Beyer)
- Young Surface of Pluto's Sputnik Planitia Caused by Viscous Relaxation (Wei)
Session 509 (1:30-3:30). Centaurs/TNOs III: Dwarf Planets and Physical Characteristics
- Dwarf Planets: Their Diameters, Albedos, Colors and Satellites Compared (Sheppard)
- The Mass, Density, and Figure of the Kuiper Belt Dwarf Planet Makemake (Parker)
- Breaking the degeneracy of Eris' pole orientation B. J. Holler)
- "Stay Active My Friend": 29P/S-W1, The Most Interesting Comet in the World (Sarid)
- Great Expectations: Anticipating Results from the First Encounter with a Cold Classical Kuiper Belt Object (Olkin)
- Pre-encounter update on (486958) 2014 MU69 and occultation results from 2017 and 2018 (Buie)
- New Horizons Distant Observations of Cold Classical KBOs (Porter)
- Solar Phase Curves of Distant Kuiper Belt Objects Observed by New Horizons' LOng-Range Reconnaissance Imager (LORRI) (Verbiscer)
- Physical properties of trans-Neptunian objects and centaurs (Fernandez-Valenzuela)
- Status and results from the Research and Education Collaborative Occultation Network (RECON) (Leiva)
- Uncovering Signatures of Refractory Materials on KBOs and Centaurs by Reflectance Spectroscopy (Seccull)
The first five items listed below are workshops presented at the upcoming DPS meeting.
These workshops are open to all DPS attendees.
Earth- and Space-Based Support for the New Horizons Kuiper Belt Extended Mission Targets
50th DPS meeting, Knoxville, TN
Monday, October 22, 2018. 12:30-1:30 pm
The centerpiece of the New Horizons Kuiper Belt Extended Mission is a
very close flyby of the cold classical KBO (486958) 2014 MU
69 on
1 January 2019. However, as a small observatory located inside the Kuiper
Belt, the New Horizons long-range reconnaissance Imager (LORRI) is well
placed to observe about two dozen other known KBOs The New Horizons team
seeks ongoing supporting Earth-based and space-based observations to
maximize the science return of the Kuiper Belt Extended Mission. We are
specifically requesting observations yielding colors, absolute
photometry at low phase angles, as well as rotational lightcurve periods
and amplitudes of our targets. A DPS workshop will describe the New
Horizons Kuiper Belt Extended Mission and bring together interested
observers to discuss and coordinate plans for our target list, which
will be shared at the workshop.
. .
JWST Solar System Observers Town Hall
50th DPS meeting, Knoxville, TN
Tuesday, October 23, 2018. 10:30-1:30 pm
The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) is an infrared-optimized telescope
that will now be launched to its orbit around the Earth-Sun L2 point in
early 2021. JWST has a robust suite of astronomical instrumentation
(imaging and spectroscopy) operating from 0.6-28.5 microns. The call for
General Observer (GO) proposals is expected to be re-issued in late
2019, with the deadline about 3 months later. At this town hall we will
provide a brief overview of JWST instrumentation; a status report on
observatory integration and preparations at the science operations
center (Space Telescope Science Institute); an overview of the currently
planned Guaranteed Time Observer proposals; a summary of observation
planning tools; and an overview of use documentation. More details about
expected proposal dates and future solar system observer planning
workshops will be provided. Our goal is to support the DPS community in
preparing and submitting a robust set of observing proposals so that we
can all benefit from the capabilities of JWST.
. .
LSST and the Solar System Workshop
50th DPS meeting, Knoxville, TN
Wednesday October 24, 2018. 4:30-6:00 pm
Over its 10 year lifespan, the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST)
will catalog over 5 million Main Belt asteroids, almost 300,000 Jupiter
Trojans, over 100,000 NEOs, over 40,000 KBOs, tens of interstellar
objects, and over 10,000 comets. Many of these objects will receive
hundreds of observations in multiple bandpasses. The LSST Solar System
Science Collaboration (SSSC) is preparing methods and tools to analyze
this data, as well as understand optimum survey strategies for
discovering moving objects throughout the Solar System.
This workshop serves as the annual meeting of the LSST SSSC, and is open
to everyone. We will provide updates on current and future activities
within the SSSC. The emphasis will not be on general LSST background but
on details relevant to Solar System science topics. In particular, this
year discussions and presentations will focus on the development of the
LSST Moving Object Processing System (MOPS), the SSSC's feedback/input
on upcoming LSST survey cadence decisions, and future community
follow-up opportunities. There will be time set aside for open
discussion for both members of the SSSC and the broader planetary
community.
Contact Meg Schwamb (
mschwamb.astro@gmail.com ) and David Trilling
(
David.Trilling@nau.edu ) with any questions
. .
A Combined Mission Strategy for Ice Giant and Kuiper Belt Exploration
50th DPS meeting, Knoxville, TN
Thursday, October 25, 2018. 12:00-1:30 pm
This workshop provides an opportunity to discuss and refine ideas for a
two-spacecraft mission to explore the Uranus and Neptune systems, a
Centaur, a Dwarf Planet in the Kuiper Belt, and at least one other small
KBO. Under this plan, an orbiter with atmospheric probe is sent to
Neptune, flying by a Centaur on the way. A separate flyby spacecraft
explores the Uranus system, a dwarf planet, and at least one other KBO.
Building on the completed NASA ice giant mission study and a recently
announced ESA study, this dual-spacecraft mission would address priority
science objectives across the deep outer solar system. After short
presentations on the NASA and ESA studies and the two-spacecraft
mission, there will be time for group discussion.
. .
Future Pluto and Kuiper Belt Missions: The View from 2018
50th DPS meeting, Knoxville, TN
Friday, October 26, 2018. 12:00-1:30 pm
The Kuiper Belt (KB) is a scientific treasure trove consisting of
comets, planetesimals, and small planets like Pluto. Since its discovery
in the early 1990s, the KB has yielded fundamental insights into
planetary accretion, the migration of planets, and the population
structure of our solar system-including the discovery that dwarf planets
like Pluto are common there.
The exploration of Pluto by New Horizons in 2015, the first KB dwarf
planet to be explored, revealed a richness of geological, atmospheric,
satellite, and compositional diversity at Pluto that rivals planets like
Mars. The flyby also revealed evidence for Pluto being an actively
evolving world over many spatial and temporal scales including evidence
for an interior ocean, active glaciers, dunes, tectonics, a wide variety
of terrain ages, and a complex atmosphere. Those results, combined with
the heterogeneous colors, surface compositions, and satellite systems of
other KB dwarf planets beg for an ongoing future in Kuiper Belt
exploration.
In this workshop we will survey 2018 work on (i) a return to Pluto with
an orbiter, (ii) Centaur missions to study KBOs, and (iii) flyby
missions to other KB dwarf planets. We will review community and
individual scientist work to motivate NASA to fund future studies
leading to the next Decadal Survey.
The 8th East-Asia Numerical Astrophysics Meeting
2018 October 22-26
National Cheng-Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
Numerical simulations have become even more important as detailed
comparisons between theories and observations are now possible at a
deeper level in most fields of astrophysics. The aim of this series of
meetings is to bring (but not limited to) East-Asian numerical
astrophysicists together and provide chances to learn each other's work
and explore possible collaborations among them. The scope of the meeting
will encompass all major astronomical research fields that involve
numerical simulations, including (but not limited to) cosmology,
astronomical hydrodynamics, magnetohydrodynamics, radiative transfer,
particle acceleration, and planetary / stellar / galactic dynamics. In
addition, there will also be a focus on computer science applications
directed toward astrophysics including numerical methods, simulation
data analysis, high performance computing, and optimization for use on
large scale computer clusters. Participants from outside of the East
Asia are warmly welcome as well.
For more information, visit the meeting website at
http://eanam8.gsroc.tw
The Pluto System After New Horizons
2019 July 14-18
The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, USA
The dates for the Pluto System After New Horizons (PSANH), an
international science conference on the Pluto system and the Kuiper
Belt, have shifted by two days to July 14-18, 2019 (Sunday through
Thursday). Please mark your calendars accordingly!
The conference will provide an opportunity to summarize our
understanding of the Pluto system and the Kuiper belt following the New
Horizons encounters with Pluto and 2014 MU69 (Ultima Thule).
Contributions spanning all relevant research on the Kuiper belt,
including both observations and theory, are being solicited.
The conference will also serve as the nucleus for a forthcoming volume,
The Pluto System After New Horizons, in the University of Arizona Space
Science Series. With a projected 2020 publication date, this new book
will be the successor to Pluto-Charon, published in 1997.
For further information regarding the conference, please contact
hal.weaver@jhuapl.edu .
Important: To be added to the mailing list to receive reminders and
other pertinent information related to the conference, including
registration and the call for abstracts, submit an Indication of
Interest at your earliest convenience, but no later than March 14, 2019.
For more information:
https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/plutosystem2019/
Newsletter Information
The
Distant EKOs Newsletter is dedicated to provide researchers with
easy and rapid access to current work regarding the Kuiper belt (observational
and theoretical studies), directly related objects (e.g., Pluto, Centaurs), and
other areas of study when explicitly applied to the Kuiper belt.
We accept submissions for the following sections:
- Abstracts of papers submitted, in press, or recently published in refereed journals
- Titles of conference presentations
- Thesis abstracts
- Short articles, announcements, or editorials
- Status reports of on-going programs
- Requests for collaboration or observing coordination
- Table of contents/outlines of books
- Announcements for conferences
- Job advertisements
- General news items deemed of interest to the Kuiper belt community
A
LaTeX
template for submissions is appended to each issue of the newsletter, and
is sent out regularly to the e-mail distribution list. Please use that
template, and send your submission to:
ekonews@boulder.swri.edu
The
Distant EKOs Newsletter is available on the World Wide Web at:
http://www.boulder.swri.edu/ekonews
Recent and back
issues of the Newsletter are archived there in various formats. The web
pages also contain other related information and links.
Distant EKOs is not a refereed publication, but is a tool for
furthering communication among people interested in Kuiper belt research.
Publication or listing of an article in the Newsletter or the web page does
not constitute an endorsement of the article's results or imply validity of its
contents. When referencing an article, please reference the original source;
Distant EKOs is not a substitute for peer-reviewed journals.
Moving ... ??
If you move or your e-mail address changes, please send the editor your new
address. If the Newsletter bounces back from an address for three consecutive
issues, the address will be deleted from the mailing list. All address
changes, submissions, and other correspondence should be sent to:
ekonews@boulder.swri.edu
File translated from
TEX
by
TTH,
version 4.12.
On 3 Oct 2018, 17:28.